Printer Location Verification for Unauthorized Printing Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for managing printer installations struggle to accurately determine the actual location of printers, leading to potential information leakage and unauthorized printing due to outdated location information.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and system that includes an information acquisition unit to gather actual installation location information and a determination unit to restrict functions based on comparisons between stored position information and acquired location information, ensuring proper usage according to the actual location.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If installation location information is registered in advance in the management server, then printing control can be performed based on pre-registered location data, but the system cannot detect when the printer location changes, leading to outdated location information being used for control decisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting control accuracyVSAvoidlocation information accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary registration of installation location information in the management server before printing control is needed. This allows the system to have advance knowledge of authorized locations and users, enabling proactive control rather than reactive response to location changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the actual installation location information is periodically compared with the pre-registered location information stored in the management server. When a discrepancy is detected, the system can trigger alerts or update the registered information, ensuring continuous accuracy of location-based printing control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If the system uses pre-registered installation location information for printing control, then administrative control is simplified, but security is compromised when printers are relocated without updating registration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting control operationVSAvoidinformation leakage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes a feedback loop where actual printer location information is continuously monitored and compared with registered information. When mismatches occur, the system can alert administrators or automatically adjust control decisions, maintaining security without excessive manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-verification by automatically comparing actual location data with registered data and initiating appropriate responses without requiring constant manual oversight. This reduces operational burden while maintaining security through automated monitoring and response mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If the management server performs determination based on registered installation location information, then processing speed is maintained, but the system permits printing at unauthorized locations when location changes occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting processing speedVSAvoidprinting authorization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary registration of authorized location information in the management server before printing operations occur. This pre-establishment of authorized locations enables fast processing during actual printing operations, as the system can quickly compare current location data against the pre-registered authorized locations without complex real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic comparison between actual and registered location information, creating a feedback mechanism that maintains accuracy over time. This allows the system to maintain fast processing speeds while periodically verifying authorization status, preventing unauthorized printing without significantly impacting processing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12236143B2Information processing apparatus enabling proper use according to actual installation location, information processing system, method of controlling information processing apparatus, method of controlling information processing system, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 CANON KK
  • US12236143B2 patent drawing
  • US12236143B2 patent drawing
  • US12236143B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus that makes it possible to properly use the apparatus according to an actual installation location of the apparatus. A multifunction peripheral as the apparatus includes an installation location information controller configured to acquire installation location information of the multifunction peripheral that performs information processing, and a controller configured to determine whether or not to restrict at least part of functions of the multifunction peripheral based on a result of comparison performed by a controller of an authentication server, which configured to compare position information stored in advance and the installation location information acquired by the installation location information controller when a predetermined time elapses.