Multifunction Printer Power Control via Usage History

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image forming systems face challenges in balancing user convenience and power saving effects during standby mode, as transitioning to power saving mode can result in increased waiting times for frequently used units or unnecessary power consumption for less frequently used units.

Innovation Solution

An image forming system with an operation terminal unit, operating means, history information recording section, and power feed control section that authenticates user access, records job history, and administers login states to control power feed to functional units based on usage patterns, ensuring that high-probability units remain active while low-probability units enter power saving mode.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If a functional unit is caused to switch over to the power saving mode, then power consumption during standby decreases, but response time increases and user convenience deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumption during standbyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making different functional units have different power states based on their individual usage characteristics. Each functional unit is independently controlled - some remain in normal mode while others enter power saving mode, based on their specific usage frequency and user needs, rather than applying a uniform power state to all units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by making the power state of functional units changeable and adaptive. The system dynamically adjusts whether each functional unit should be in normal mode or power saving mode based on real-time login states and historical usage patterns, allowing the power configuration to evolve with user behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If a functional unit that is not used with high probability is not caused to switch over to the power saving mode, then user convenience is maintained, but useless power consumption occurs and power saving effect decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by using historical usage information to inform future power state decisions. The system records and analyzes past usage patterns of each functional unit, then uses this feedback to predict future usage and appropriately set power states, creating a closed-loop system that continuously improves power management based on actual usage data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by proactively setting power states based on predicted usage patterns before users actually need the functional units. By analyzing historical data and login states, the system anticipates which units will be needed and pre-positions them in appropriate power states, preventing both unnecessary power consumption and potential user inconvenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of energy

If functional units are controlled to switch to power saving mode based on usage patterns, then power saving effect is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower saving effectVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the power control function into independent, modular components. Each functional unit has its own power state management that can be independently controlled based on its specific usage characteristics. This modular approach allows complex power management to be broken down into manageable, independent decision units rather than a monolithic control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8891095B2Image forming system and image forming apparatus
Publication Date: 2014.11.18 SHARP KK
  • US8891095B2 patent drawing
  • US8891095B2 patent drawing
  • US8891095B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image forming system contains a multifunctional printer that has a plurality of functional units and is capable of controlling transition to a power saving mode for each functional unit. Further, the image forming system includes personal computers and a server. The server, in the power saving mode, sets one or more functional units that are determined to be switched over to the power saving mode from among the plurality of functional units based on time entry, log-in states of users to the personal computers, and a history of past usage of the multifunctional printer.