Printer Registration Control via Acquisition Method Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing information processing apparatuses face challenges in efficiently sharing and utilizing registration information of printers across different applications, leading to increased processing time and potential printer registration conflicts.

Innovation Solution

A control method for an information processing apparatus that acquires and shares printer registration information using a first program, allowing cooperative activation and processing based on the shared information, while ensuring compatibility and avoiding conflicts by determining the usability of the shared information across different activation methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If registration information is shared across all applications regardless of acquisition method, then information sharing efficiency is improved, but printer registration conflicts and compatibility issues occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation sharing efficiencyVSAvoidprinter registration stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the sharing behavior based on the acquisition method. Information acquired through automatic acquisition is shared across applications, while information acquired through manual acquisition is not shared. This creates different quality characteristics for different data sources, resolving the contradiction between sharing efficiency and registration stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of information shareability based on the acquisition method. By introducing a classification mechanism that assigns different shareability parameters to automatically acquired versus manually acquired information, the system enables efficient sharing where appropriate while preventing conflicts, thus resolving the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If automatic printer search and registration is performed in all applications, then ease of operation is improved, but unintended printer registration changes occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinter registration convenienceVSAvoidprinter registration consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by granting automatic search and registration functionality only to applications that acquire information automatically, while preventing this functionality in applications that acquire information manually. This localized approach maintains operational convenience for appropriate applications while ensuring registration consistency across the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism (the information acquisition method classification) that mediates between the desire for easy operation and the need for registration consistency. This intermediary controls which applications can perform automatic registration, balancing user convenience with system stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If all applications can access shared registration information, then application cooperation is improved, but processing time increases due to compatibility checks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication cooperation capabilityVSAvoidinformation processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-classifying information based on acquisition method before sharing occurs. This preliminary classification establishes clear rules for what information should be shared, eliminating the need for runtime compatibility checks and reducing processing time while maintaining appropriate cooperation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by enabling information access only in applications with matching acquisition methods. This localized access control improves cooperation capability where appropriate while avoiding unnecessary processing overhead in incompatible applications, thus reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11528762B2Information processing apparatus and control method of the same
Publication Date: 2022.12.13 CANON KK
  • US11528762B2 patent drawing
  • US11528762B2 patent drawing
  • US11528762B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a case where predetermined information is acquired by a first program using a first method, control is performed such that processing that is based on the predetermined information is executed by a second program based on an activation of the second program. In a case where the predetermined information is acquired by the first program using a second method, control is performed such that the processing that is based on the predetermined information is not executed by the second program even if the second program is activated.