Printhead Latching Assembly Cam Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for mounting printheads in high-speed printing machines are cumbersome and time-consuming, requiring precise manual screw tightening, which can lead to user fatigue and risks of over-tightening or thread damage.

Innovation Solution

A latching assembly with a cam mechanism and force transmission elements that allows for a two-stage clamping operation, reducing the number of turns required for secure mounting and providing a mechanical advantage for easier and safer printhead attachment to the carrier plate assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual screw tightening is used to mount printheads, then proper seating and fluid-tight engagement can be achieved, but the process becomes cumbersome and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproper seating and fluid-tight engagementVSAvoidmounting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting process is segmented into two distinct phases: a first phase that advances the printhead to a preliminary positioned state, and a second phase that completes the tightening to achieve final proper seating. This segmentation allows each phase to be optimized independently, reducing total mounting time while ensuring reliable fluid-tight engagement is achieved in the second phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first actuator performs preliminary action by advancing the printhead to a pre-positioned state before the second actuator completes the tightening. This preliminary positioning reduces the remaining travel distance and ensures proper alignment before final engagement, thereby reducing overall mounting time while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If multiple full turns of fasteners are required to seat the printhead, then proper engagement is ensured, but user fatigue increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproper engagementVSAvoiduser fatigue
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical tightening operation is replaced with an automated actuation system. The first and second actuators automatically perform the multi-turn tightening sequence without requiring manual intervention for each rotation, eliminating user fatigue while ensuring proper engagement through controlled incremental advancement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The tightening operation is divided into two automated stages performed by separate actuators. The first actuator handles the preliminary turns to reach a positioned state, and the second actuator completes the final tightening. This segmentation automates what would otherwise require sustained manual effort, reducing user fatigue while maintaining proper engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If fasteners are tightened without torque control, then mounting is simpler, but risk of over-tightening and thread damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting simplicityVSAvoidthread integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The first actuator performs preliminary advancement to a positioned state before the second actuator completes the tightening. This staged approach allows controlled incremental loading, preventing sudden excessive forces that could damage threads, while maintaining mounting simplicity through automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The two-stage actuation system dynamically controls the tightening process by dividing it into preliminary advancement and final tightening phases. This dynamic control ensures forces are applied gradually and appropriately at each stage, protecting thread integrity while maintaining operational simplicity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If a two-stage clamping operation is implemented, then mounting efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting efficiencyVSAvoidlatching assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The latching assembly merges the two-stage actuation system with the printhead mounting mechanism into an integrated unit. By combining the actuators, force transmission elements, and cam mechanism into a single latching assembly that attaches to the carrier plate, the patent achieves mounting efficiency through automated two-stage operation while managing complexity through integration rather than separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The latching assembly serves multiple functions: it provides the two-stage actuation mechanism, transmits force from actuators to the printhead, engages with the carrier plate, and ensures proper seating. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate systems into a single integrated assembly, improving productivity while controlling overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The latching assembly simplifies the mounting process, reduces user fatigue, and ensures proper seating and fluid-tight engagement of printheads with minimal risk of over-tightening or thread damage, enhancing operational efficiency and reliability.

Implementation Method 1

a cam mechanism defined between the plate assembly and the first cam end and the second cam end. The cam mechanism is configured to draw the first head end toward the plate assembly upon rotation of the first cam end and to draw the second head end toward the plate assembly upon rotation of the second cam end

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam mechanism: Cam

Implementation Method 2

a first force transmission element disposed between the first head end and the second head end, a second force transmission element disposed between the second head end and the printhead

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force transmission: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS8403458B2Latching assembly for a printhead
Publication Date: 2013.03.26 GENESEE VALLEY INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US8403458B2 patent drawing
  • US8403458B2 patent drawing
  • US8403458B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A latching assembly for mounting a printhead to a plate assembly of a printing machine includes a first elongated actuator and a second elongated actuator defining a bore to slidably receive the first actuator. A first spring is disposed between the heads of the first and second actuators, while a second spring is disposed between the second actuator and the printhead to exert a clamping force. A cam mechanism is defined between the plate assembly and the ends of the actuators that is configured to draw the head of the first actuator toward the plate assembly upon rotation of the first actuator and to independently draw the head of the second actuator toward the plate assembly upon rotation of said second actuator. Movement of said first actuator exerts an initial clamping force while movement of the second actuator produces a final clamping force on the printhead.