Printhead Pixel Dropout Detection via Image Intensity Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pixel dropout in printheads, such as thermal and inkjet printheads, results in defective printed substrates, leading to increased costs due to the need for remaking substrates, as existing detection methods are not efficient in identifying the issue promptly.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the analysis of captured images of printed substrates or print ribbons using a mechanical image capture device and processing device to generate datasets of integrated intensity values, identifying delta function-like discontinuities that indicate potential pixel dropout, and generating an alert signal for further investigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If existing detection methods are used, then pixel dropout is not detected promptly, but implementation complexity is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection timeVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The image is divided into multiple rows and columns, with intensity values calculated for each row and column separately. This segmentation allows efficient processing of large images by breaking them into manageable segments that can be analyzed independently for dropout detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical or manual inspection methods with an automated image processing system that uses intensity value analysis. This substitution enables prompt detection while maintaining relatively simple implementation through software-based image analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If pixel dropout is not detected early, then number of defective substrates increases, but detection method complexity is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate qualityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs detection immediately after printing by capturing and analyzing the image right away. This preliminary action ensures that pixel dropout is identified before substrates are processed further or stacked, enabling timely detection while using a relatively simple intensity analysis approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides immediate feedback by analyzing intensity values and identifying dropout patterns in real-time. This feedback mechanism allows for prompt detection of defective print elements, improving substrate quality assurance without requiring complex multi-step verification processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If substrates are remade due to undetected pixel dropout, then costs increase, but detection capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces insufficient manual or basic detection capabilities with an automated image processing system that calculates intensity values and identifies dropout patterns algorithmically. This substitution significantly improves defect detection capability while maintaining relatively simple implementation through software-based analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a digital copy of the printed substrate through image capture and processes this copy for defect detection. This copying approach enables thorough analysis of substrate quality without requiring physical inspection, improving detection capability while keeping the system relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentEP3003725B1Method for determining pixel dropout
Publication Date: 2020.12.02 ENTRUST DATACARD
  • EP3003725B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3003725B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3003725B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A technique is described for determining pixel dropout in a printhead that has a plurality of print elements arrayed along an axis. In the technique, a dataset of integrated intensity values, in the printing direction on a substrate, of a captured image is generated and used to determine if pixel dropout has or may have occurred.