Printing Apparatus Job Sharing Compatibility Check

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing printing systems face challenges when sharing printing jobs among different types of printing apparatuses, as unconditional approval can lead to unsuitable results, while unconditional prohibition reduces convenience and the likelihood of job sharing.

Innovation Solution

A printing apparatus that determines whether to perform printing on a job based on three criteria: whether the job includes printing settings dependent on the type of apparatus, image rotation processing, and data format compatibility, allowing for conditional sharing and improved convenience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If printing jobs are shared unconditionally among different types of printing apparatuses, then convenience and job sharing probability increase, but printing quality and reliability deteriorate due to incompatible settings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvenience of printing job sharingVSAvoidprinting quality reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of job sharing from unconditional to conditional based on three key parameters: (1) presence of apparatus-type-dependent printing settings, (2) image rotation processing requirements, and (3) data format compatibility. This parameter-based filtering resolves the contradiction by allowing sharing only when compatibility conditions are met, ensuring both convenience and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If printing jobs are shared among different types of printing apparatuses, then adaptability increases, but device complexity increases due to multiple determination criteria

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting job sharing capabilityVSAvoiddetermination system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the determination process into three independent evaluation criteria: (1) apparatus-type-dependent settings check, (2) image rotation processing check, and (3) data format compatibility check. Each criterion is evaluated separately, and the overall determination is made based on the combination of these segmented evaluations. This segmentation reduces complexity by making each determination step independent and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary determination mechanism that acts as a mediator between the printing job transmission request and the actual printing execution. This intermediary evaluates the three compatibility criteria and makes a go/no-go decision, simplifying the overall system architecture by centralizing the complexity in a dedicated determination layer rather than distributing it throughout the entire printing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If printing settings dependent on apparatus type are present, then printing precision is maintained, but adaptability decreases due to restricted job sharing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting precisionVSAvoidprinting job sharing flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter-based conditional logic to change the state of job sharing from restricted to permitted based on the presence or absence of apparatus-type-dependent settings. When such settings are detected, the system maintains printing precision by blocking sharing; when absent, it enables sharing to maximize adaptability. This dynamic parameter-based control resolves the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11204725B2Printing apparatus and printing processing method for controlling printing between printing apparatuses
Publication Date: 2021.12.21 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US11204725B2 patent drawing
  • US11204725B2 patent drawing
  • US11204725B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A printing apparatus determines whether or not a printing job accumulated by a different printing apparatus different in type from the printing apparatus itself is configured to be performed by the printing apparatus, based on at least one determination of a first determination of whether or not the printing job includes a printing setting dependent on a type of apparatus, a second determination relating to processing that rotates a printing image, and a third determination relating to a data format of the printing image.