Printing Apparatus Code Size Adaptation for Medium Types

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bar code printing technologies face quality reduction when used with media types lacking pre-stored correction information, requiring users to perform trial and error, thereby increasing user burden and reducing printing stability.

Innovation Solution

A printing apparatus and method that includes a transport unit, printing unit, and control unit to perform first and second printing processing, where a code group with varying sizes is printed on a medium, reading data is acquired, and the code size is determined based on this data for subsequent printing, ensuring optimal code size adoption for the medium type.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pre-stored correction information is used for bar code printing, then printing quality is maintained for known media types, but user burden increases for media without pre-stored correction information requiring trial and error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting qualityVSAvoiduser burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs trial printing and evaluation without user intervention. The printing apparatus autonomously determines optimal printing parameters by conducting trial prints on the medium, evaluating the results through reading accuracy, and automatically selecting the best parameters for subsequent printing operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses reading unit feedback to evaluate trial printing results. The reading unit reads the trial-printed codes and provides feedback on reading accuracy, which the control unit uses to determine whether to adopt the trial printing parameters for normal operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If trial and error method is used to obtain appropriate code size, then code quality can be optimized for specific media, but time consumption and user burden increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode qualityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary trial printing automatically before normal printing operations. By conducting the trial print and evaluation process automatically without user intervention, the system eliminates the time-consuming manual trial and error process while still achieving optimized code quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system autonomously completes the entire trial printing and parameter optimization process without user involvement. The control unit automatically manages trial printing, collects reading data, evaluates results, and determines optimal parameters, freeing the user from time-consuming manual adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If manual adjustment of code parameters is required for different media types, then printing quality can be maintained, but operation complexity and user burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting qualityVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically adapts to different medium types by performing trial printing and self-evaluation. The control unit autonomously determines optimal printing parameters for each medium type without requiring user knowledge or manual adjustment, simplifying operation while maintaining quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically changes printing parameters based on medium type detection and trial printing results. The control unit adjusts code size, dot configuration, and other parameters according to the evaluated performance on the specific medium, eliminating the need for manual parameter adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11829819B2Printing apparatus and method obtaining appropriate code size for medium type based on results of trial printing group of different sized codes
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US11829819B2 patent drawing
  • US11829819B2 patent drawing
  • US11829819B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A printing apparatus includes a transport unit, a printing unit, a reading unit, and a control unit configured to control the transport unit and the printing unit to perform first printing processing and second printing processing, wherein the control unit prints, in the first printing processing, a code group including a first code of a first size and a second code of a second size larger than the first size on a first medium that is the medium, acquires reading data that is a result of reading, by the reading unit, of the code group printed on the first medium, determines a code size to be adopted for the second printing processing based on the reading data, and, in the second printing processing, prints a third code of the code size on a medium of the same type as that of the first medium.