Printing System Job Combination Control for Case Binding Consistency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In digital multifunction peripherals, job combination processes often result in improper output when finishing processes are not consistently set, leading to inadequate selection or exclusion of jobs during the creation of combined printed materials, particularly in case binding scenarios where a cover is required.

Innovation Solution

A printing system with a control unit that inhibits the exclusion of specific jobs from finishing processes, ensuring consistent settings and proper execution of finishing processes, such as case binding, by integrating an input unit, storage unit, printing unit, finishing unit, and combined job processing unit to manage and print multiple jobs as one, while preventing the creation of combined printed materials without essential print data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If job combination is allowed to freely select and combine multiple jobs, then user flexibility and adaptability are improved, but the risk of creating improper output results increases when finishing processes are not consistently set

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejob selection flexibilityVSAvoidoutput result correctness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by proactively preventing the selection of jobs that would result in improper output. The control unit checks job attributes and finishing process requirements before allowing job combination, and actively inhibits selection of jobs that would create inconsistent finishing settings. This prevents the problem before it occurs rather than correcting it afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring job selections and comparing them against finishing process requirements. The control unit provides real-time feedback to the user by displaying whether selected jobs are compatible with the chosen finishing process, and automatically adjusting job availability based on the selected finishing operation. This ensures only compatible job combinations are permitted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system inhibits selection of specific jobs for finishing processes, then output result correctness is improved, but user flexibility and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinishing process consistencyVSAvoidjob selection freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-configuring job attributes and finishing process requirements before the user makes selections. The control unit automatically identifies which jobs are suitable for each finishing process based on pre-stored job information, and prepares the job list for display accordingly. This eliminates the need for users to manually verify compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies self-service by automatically managing job selection constraints without requiring user intervention. The control unit autonomously determines which jobs should be available or inhibited based on the selected finishing process, and dynamically adjusts the job combination interface. Users simply select from pre-filtered options without needing to understand the underlying constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If the system allows creating combined printed materials without specific print data, then productivity and ease of operation are improved, but the quality and integrity of finishing processes deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombined material creation speedVSAvoidfinishing process integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by applying different rules to different jobs within the combination. Specifically, certain jobs with specific attributes (such as cover pages or documents requiring binding) are marked as mandatory for particular finishing processes. The control unit enforces these local quality requirements while allowing flexibility for other jobs that do not have special finishing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8693026B2Printing system, apparatus and control method therefor, storage medium and program
Publication Date: 2014.04.08 CANON KK
  • US8693026B2 patent drawing
  • US8693026B2 patent drawing
  • US8693026B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A printing apparatus capable of, when a predetermined finishing process is set in performing job combination, executing the finishing process at consistent settings by properly performing an inhibition process corresponding to the finishing process. When a predetermined finishing process is set as an entire setting of job combination, the system inhibits excluding, from targets of the predetermined finishing process, a predetermined job corresponding to the predetermined finishing process among a plurality of jobs associated with job combination.