Printing Machine Setup Using Unique Tool Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current setup process for printing machines is prone to errors due to the reliance on manual selection of printing tools and colors by technicians, leading to inefficiencies and waste, especially when dealing with multiple tools of similar purpose but varying aging states.

Innovation Solution

A method that utilizes job information specific to each print job, including unique tool information to identify individual printing tools, is provided through a mobile device, which can read machine-readable codes and ensure the correct selection of tools based on their aging state and availability, reducing human error and streamlining the setup process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual selection of printing tools and inks is used during setup, then the process is simple and flexible, but error susceptibility increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror susceptibilityVSAvoidsetup process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated job information provision. The printing press automatically receives and processes job information containing tool specifications, eliminating the need for manual technician intervention in tool selection. The system self-identifies required tools and their locations, reducing human error while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the printing press communicates with the central planning system to confirm tool usage and status. Job information is automatically updated based on actual tool consumption and availability, creating a closed-loop system that continuously optimizes tool allocation and reduces errors through real-time information feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If individual tool tracking with unique specifications is implemented, then tool selection accuracy improves, but information management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool identification accuracyVSAvoidinformation management burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The central planning system serves multiple functions: it tracks individual tool specifications, manages job information, monitors tool availability and aging state, and coordinates with printing presses. This multi-functional approach consolidates information management tasks into a single system, reducing overall information management burden while maintaining high identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges tool tracking information with job information into a unified data structure. Unique tool specifications are integrated with job requirements, allowing the system to automatically match tools to jobs based on combined criteria. This merging eliminates the need for separate tracking systems and reduces information management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If automated job information provision is used, then setup speed increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesetup speedVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The central planning system prepares job information in advance, including tool specifications and location data, before the printing press needs them. This preliminary action allows the printing press to quickly retrieve and process information without performing complex real-time calculations, thereby increasing setup speed while keeping the system architecture relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The central planning system acts as an intermediary between tool storage locations and printing presses. It mediates the information exchange by consolidating tool data and job requirements, then providing processed job information to printing presses. This intermediary role simplifies the overall system architecture by centralizing information management rather than requiring direct complex interactions between all components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4279279A1Method for setting up a printing machine, mobile device and system with a printing machine
Publication Date: 2023.11.22 THE GREY ELEPHANT OHG
  • EP4279279A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4279279A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4279279A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for setting up a printing press (10), wherein the printing press (10) comprises a plurality of printing units (11a-d), at least some of which are each equipped with a printing tool and/or ink for completing a printing job of the printing press (10). To reduce the susceptibility to errors during printing press setup and to increase the overall efficiency of the printing process, it is proposed that job information specific to each print job be provided, which specifies for each printing unit (11a-d) of the printing press (10) which printing tool and/or ink it is to be equipped with, wherein the job information includes a unique tool identifier that serves to identify an individual physical printing tool. The invention also relates to a mobile device (30) and a system comprising a printing press and a mobile device.