Printing Machine Nip Confirmation System Using Automated Roller Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In printing machines, accurately determining the direction and angle to rotate rollers for nip checking is challenging due to complex roller arrangements and limited visual access, leading to potential false recognition.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a subject roller selecting section, main gear rotation angle calculating section, and main gear rotation driving section to rotate the main gear by a determined angle, allowing operators to visually recognize the nip without considering rotation direction, assisted by audio and light source illumination to facilitate identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a sensor or automated checking method is used to avoid dependence on operator skills, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and unit price increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenip checking accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows operators to perform self-checking of nip conditions using the automated rotation and positioning functions. The operator simply selects the roller and the system automatically positions it for inspection, combining automated assistance with manual verification to avoid full automation complexity while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex sensor-based detection systems with a mechanical rotation and positioning system. Instead of using multiple sensors to detect nip conditions, the system mechanically rotates the roller to a predetermined angle where the nip becomes visually accessible, substituting mechanical motion for complex sensing infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Area of stationary object

If the roller group is closely arranged within the printing unit, then space utilization is improved, but the space through which the subject roller can be visually recognized becomes small

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting unit spaceVSAvoidvisual access to roller
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically rotates the roller from its original position to a predetermined angle where visual access is optimized. This dynamic repositioning allows the compact roller arrangement to maintain both space efficiency and operational accessibility, as rollers are moved only when needed for inspection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-calculates and stores the optimal rotation angles for visual inspection in advance. When a nip check is required, the roller is rotated to the predetermined angle that has been optimized for visual recognition, eliminating the need for operators to search or manually adjust positions during the inspection process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the main gear is rotated to position the subject roller for viewing, then ease of operation is improved, but it becomes difficult to know the rotation direction and angle without automation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroller positioningVSAvoidrotation direction and angle information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that provide the operator with information about the current roller position and the required rotation angle. This feedback eliminates the information loss by clearly indicating to the operator how far and in which direction to rotate the main gear, combining automated calculation with clear operational guidance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system acts as an intermediary that calculates the optimal rotation angle based on the selected roller and communicates this information to the operator. This intermediary function bridges the gap between the complex mechanical system and the operator, providing clear instructions without requiring the operator to understand the underlying complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP1990198B1Nip confirmation system of printing machine and program
Publication Date: 2013.04.03 MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND PRINTING & PACKAGING MACHINERY
  • EP1990198B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1990198B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1990198B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An object is to provide a printing machine nip checking system and the like that facilitates a nip checking operation. In the invention, a subject roller selecting section 10 is provided that selects a roller of which a nip width is to be checked. When a subject is narrowed, a main gear rotation angle calculating section 11 determines a rotation angle of the selected roller, in addition to a rotation direction. A main gear rotation driving section 13 connected to the main gear rotation angle calculating section 11 rotates a main gear 18 by the calculated desired angle, after the main gear 18 is stopped for a certain amount of time. As a result, an operator can visually recognize a nip on a subject gear without particularly considering the rotation direction and the rotation angle of the main gear 18.