Printing Parameter Prediction Model for Color Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current printing methods require time-consuming and costly trial-and-error processes to achieve satisfactory print results, necessitating separate profiles for each ink, spot color, and substrate combination, with manual optimization of printing parameters.

Innovation Solution

A method that predicts and adjusts printing parameters using sample print data, allowing for the extrapolation of printing conditions to achieve desired color results without the need for test prints, by integrating into a color management system to optimize printing parameters efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If trial and error method is used to verify printing parameters, then printing quality can be ensured, but time consumption and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting qualityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculation of printing parameters using a color prediction model before actual printing. The control unit calculates optimal printing parameters based on ink formula, substrate type, and desired color values, eliminating the need for time-consuming trial and error test prints while ensuring printing quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If separate profiles are created for each ink, spot color, and substrate combination, then printing accuracy is improved, but device complexity and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting accuracyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a color prediction model that dynamically adjusts printing parameters based on input variables such as ink formula composition, substrate type, and desired color values. Instead of maintaining separate static profiles, the model calculates optimal parameters by changing key variables, reducing complexity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If manual optimization of printing parameters is performed, then printing quality can be improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting qualityVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit automatically performs optimization of printing parameters using the color prediction model without requiring manual intervention. The system self-adjusts parameters based on the calculated predictions, eliminating the need for operators to manually optimize each print job, thereby improving productivity while maintaining quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If test printing is conducted to verify parameters, then reliability of print output is ensured, but costs and time loss increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of print outputVSAvoidcosts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical trial-and-error printing process with a computational color prediction model. The control unit uses algorithms to predict optimal printing parameters based on ink formulas and substrate properties, substituting physical test prints with digital calculations, thereby ensuring reliability without the associated costs and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10838669B2Printing method with includes selection of print parameters
Publication Date: 2020.11.17 SIEGWERK DRUCKFARBEN GMBH & CO KG
  • US10838669B2 patent drawing
  • US10838669B2 patent drawing
  • US10838669B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A printing method comprising the steps of providing, in relation to data of a print job to be carried out, at least one prediction for print data for at least one selection of print parameters using at least one set of sample print data (S107). At least one print parameter is optionally adjusted to provide a prediction which comes sufficiently close to the data of the print job (B109). A software product for performing the method is also disclosed, and the use of the software product for determining printing parameters for a printing method.