Printing System Post-Process Segmentation for Partial Job Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional printing systems in the POD market lack the ability to flexibly select and combine post-process settings for entire and partial print jobs, leading to inefficiencies and unnecessary output of printed materials.

Innovation Solution

A printing system comprising a first setting unit for post-processes on entire sheets, a second setting unit for post-processes on partial sheets, and a control unit to execute these settings, allowing for flexible execution of post-processes on both entire and partial print jobs while minimizing unnecessary output.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional printing systems are used, then the system structure is simple, but the ability to flexibly select and combine post-process settings for entire and partial print jobs is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in post-process settingsVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides post-process settings into two independent segments: a first setting unit for entire print jobs and a second setting unit for partial print jobs. This segmentation allows flexible combination of different post-process types (binding, cutting, folding) on different portions of printed materials without requiring complete system redesign, thus improving adaptability while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit dynamically selects and executes post-process settings based on the specific requirements of each print job. The system can adaptively combine first and second post-process settings in various configurations, allowing the same hardware to handle diverse post-processing needs without physical reconfiguration, thereby enhancing versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of substance

If all post-process settings are applied to entire print jobs, then the control logic is simple, but unnecessary printed materials are output when partial post-processes are needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunnecessary printed materialsVSAvoidcontrol logic
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by allowing different post-process settings to be applied to different portions of printed materials. The second setting unit enables selective post-processing of specific sheets or groups of sheets within a print job, so that only the necessary portions receive specific treatments (e.g., binding only certain pages), thereby preventing unnecessary material output while managing complexity through localized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of requiring complete post-process application to entire jobs, the system allows partial action by applying post-processes only to specific portions when needed. The control unit can select to apply first post-process settings to entire jobs or second post-process settings to partial portions, avoiding excessive action on unnecessary materials while maintaining flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If multiple post-process settings are combined within one print job, then productivity is improved, but the risk of incorrect settings increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidsetting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit incorporates feedback mechanisms to verify and manage post-process settings. When multiple first and second post-process settings are combined, the control unit monitors and coordinates their execution to ensure consistency and accuracy, preventing incorrect settings while maintaining high productivity through automated multi-step processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9272561B2Printing system for inhibiting Z-folding and control method thereof
Publication Date: 2016.03.01 CANON KK
  • US9272561B2 patent drawing
  • US9272561B2 patent drawing
  • US9272561B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A printing system for controlling to allow various settings by one job and reducing output of unnecessary printed materials is provided. To accomplish this, the present invention sets a post-process to be executed for a plurality of sheets that are printed by execution of a job as a first setting, sets a post-process to be executed for part of the sheets included in the plurality of sheets as a second setting, and causes a post-processing unit to execute post-processes according to the setting of the post-processes set as the first setting and the second setting.