Printing Press Preset Learning From Operator Adjustments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing printing press presetting methods often result in suboptimal products due to incorrect presets, despite the use of computer-supported systems, as operators manually adjust settings without a systematic approach to optimize future jobs.

Innovation Solution

A method that records and analyzes repetitive operator changes to presets using computer-aided methods, determining whether these changes lead to optimization, and adjusts future presets accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If operators manually adjust presettings on the printing press, then the presets can be adapted to operational needs, but the presettings may become suboptimal and lead to suboptimal products

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability of presetsVSAvoidpresetting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system records operator changes to presettings and uses this feedback to automatically adjust and optimize presets for future print jobs. The machine control system learns from operator interventions and continuously improves preset accuracy based on actual operational data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The printing press system automatically optimizes its own presettings by analyzing recorded operator changes and applying improvements without requiring external intervention. The system serves itself by learning from its own operational data and making autonomous presetting adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If operator changes to presettings are made manually, then adjustments can be made flexibly, but systematic optimization of future jobs is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility of adjustmentsVSAvoidoptimization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system captures operator changes as feedback data and systematically analyzes this information to optimize future presettings. This creates a closed-loop system where operational experience is continuously converted into improved productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares optimized presettings in advance for future print jobs based on analyzed operator changes. By learning from past operations, the system proactively configures optimal settings before the next job begins, improving productivity without compromising operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If presettings are kept static, then consistency is maintained, but suboptimal products are produced when presets become incorrect

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of presettingsVSAvoidproduct quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static presettings to dynamic, adaptive presettings that automatically adjust based on recorded operator changes. This allows the system to maintain consistency through systematic learning while adapting to changing operational requirements to preserve product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system modifies presetting parameters automatically based on analyzed operator interventions. By systematically changing parameters based on real operational data, the system maintains both consistency and adaptability, ensuring optimal product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4197785B1Method for operating a printing machine with a machine control
Publication Date: 2025.08.27 HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN AG
  • EP4197785B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method according to the invention for operating a printing press with a machine control system, wherein the machine control system (2) makes computer-aided presettings (8) for the printing jobs (4) on the printing press (1) during the execution of printing jobs (4), is characterized in that, in the case of several printing jobs (4) and/or several operator interventions (11), recurring operator-related changes (10) to the presettings (8) or to the preset printing press (1) are recorded by computer and analyzed by computer to obtain presetting adjustments (9), and that the presettings (8) for future printing jobs (7) are changed based on the presetting adjustments (9). This method advantageously enables the optimal presetting of a printing press.