Printing-Based Proof-of-Work for Low-Energy Blockchain Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high energy consumption associated with the proof-of-work process in blockchain technology, particularly for generating and validating blocks, is a significant challenge that needs to be addressed.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method utilizing a printing device to generate and validate blockchain blocks by blending pigments based on printer control settings, transferring the mining process to a physical operation that requires minimal electrical energy, thereby reducing energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional proof-of-work methods are used for blockchain validation, then security and decentralization are maintained, but electrical energy consumption becomes excessively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblockchain securityVSAvoidelectrical energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the electrical computational mechanism with a mechanical printing mechanism. Instead of using high-power computer processors to solve cryptographic puzzles, the system uses a printing device to physically print images on paper with varying degrees of ink penetration. The proof-of-work is validated by examining the physical characteristics of the printed image, particularly the ink penetration depth which is difficult to forge. This mechanical substitution dramatically reduces electrical energy consumption while maintaining blockchain security through physical unclonability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If computational power is increased to solve proof-of-work faster, then block validation speed improves, but energy consumption increases proportionally

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblock validation speedVSAvoidelectrical energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes electrical computation with a mechanical printing process. The printing device operates at low power while producing physical proof-of-work through ink penetration on paper. The validation speed is determined by the printing mechanism's speed rather than computational power, achieving block validation without the proportional energy consumption of traditional computational methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Stability of the object's composition

If cryptographic hash functions are used for proof-of-work, then data integrity and immutability are ensured, but the process requires enormous energy input

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces cryptographic hash computation with a physical printing process. The data integrity is ensured not through computational hashing but through the physical characteristics of the printed image - specifically the ink penetration depth into the paper which creates a unique, difficult-to-replicate physical signature. This mechanical approach maintains data immutability while eliminating the enormous energy input required by cryptographic proof-of-work systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of proof-of-work from computational complexity to physical material properties. Instead of measuring work by the number of hash computations, the system measures work by the physical characteristics of the printed image - ink penetration depth, paper absorption patterns, and printing pressure marks. This parameter change transforms the energy-intensive computational process into a low-energy physical process while maintaining security through the difficulty of replicating specific physical material states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces electrical energy consumption by up to 99% compared to traditional methods, contributing to lower costs and CO2 emissions by leveraging the high entropy of solid particle bulks in the blending process.

Implementation Method 1

leveraging the high entropy of solid particle bulks in the blending process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEntropy:

Data Source

PatentUS12462132B2Ecological mining using at least one printing device for proof-of-work
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 BASF SE
  • US12462132B2 patent drawing
  • US12462132B2 patent drawing
  • US12462132B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer implemented method for proof-of-work for generating and validating a block of a blockchain using at least one printing device is proposed. The printing device is configured for generating at least one digital image depending on a printer control setting. The method comprises the following steps: i) (110) providing an initial digital image (112) comprising a plurality of colored pixels, wherein the initial digital image (110) is taken from an image database and/or is generated by printing and scanning the initial digital image by using an initial printer control setting; ii) (114) providing a task digital image (116) comprising a plurality of colored pixels different from the initial digital image (112); iii) (118) selecting a mining printer control setting (120), printing the initial digital image (112) by using the printing device by blending pigments with the selected mining printer control setting (120) and scanning the printed image by using at least one scanning device, thereby generating a mining digital image (122) having a plurality of colored pixels different from the initial digital image (112); iv) (124) comparing the colored pixels of the mining digital image (122) and the task digital image (116) by using at least one processing device; wherein the method comprises repeating steps ii) (114) to iv) (124) until the colored pixels of the mining digital image (122) and the task digital image (116) are found to be identical, wherein in each case in step iii) (118) a different mining printer control setting (120) is selected, wherein the mining printer control setting (120) for which the mining digital image (122) and the task digital image (116) are found to be identical is used as the proof-of-work for generating and validating the block of the blockchain.