Printing Apparatus Reactant Liquid Ejection Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ink jet printing systems face a decrease in abrasion resistance when excessive reactant liquid is ejected, particularly when using non-absorbent media like polyvinyl chloride, leading to reduced print quality.

Innovation Solution

A control system adjusts the ejection duty of the reactant liquid based on the ink ejection duty to maintain optimal print quality and abrasion resistance, with specific ratios set for different ink ejection levels, and an optional heating mechanism to reduce reactant liquid consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If excessive reactant liquid is ejected to improve ink fixing properties, then the fixing properties of ink to medium are improved, but the abrasion resistance of printed images deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixing propertiesVSAvoidabrasion resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control of reactant liquid ejection by adjusting the ejection duty ratio based on the ink ejection duty ratio. The control section dynamically modifies the reactant liquid ejection amount according to the actual printing conditions and ink ejection patterns, transitioning from static fixed ejection to adaptive dynamic ejection that optimizes both fixing properties and abrasion resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the ejection duty ratio parameter of the reactant liquid based on the ink ejection duty ratio. By adjusting this parameter, the system optimizes the reactant liquid ejection amount to maintain appropriate proportions between ink and reactant liquid, thereby improving both fixing properties and abrasion resistance through parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If excessive reactant liquid is ejected to enhance ink fixation, then the ink fixing properties are improved, but the amount of reactant liquid consumed increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixing propertiesVSAvoidreactant liquid consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by ejecting only the necessary amount of reactant liquid based on actual printing conditions rather than excessive ejection. The control section calculates appropriate ejection duties that provide sufficient fixing without waste, implementing precise controlled ejection that matches actual ink ejection patterns and medium characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by monitoring ink ejection duty ratios and using this information to adjust reactant liquid ejection accordingly. The control section continuously adapts the reactant liquid ejection amount based on actual printing conditions, ensuring optimal fixing properties while minimizing reactant liquid consumption through closed-loop control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If reactant liquid ejection amount is increased to maintain print quality, then the fixing properties are improved, but the abrasion resistance deteriorates particularly on non-absorbent media

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprint qualityVSAvoidabrasion resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality control by adjusting reactant liquid ejection based on local printing conditions including ink ejection duty ratios and medium characteristics. The control section modifies ejection parameters according to specific printing scenarios, providing optimized fixing and abrasion resistance for different regions and conditions rather than uniform ejection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts reactant liquid ejection to match actual printing conditions and ink ejection patterns. By transitioning from static to dynamic ejection control, the system maintains appropriate reactant liquid to ink ratios under varying conditions, optimizing both print quality and abrasion resistance without excessive ejection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively suppresses the fall in abrasion resistance while maintaining print quality by optimizing the ejection duties and reducing reactant liquid consumption through controlled ejection and heating.

Implementation Method 1

a heating section that heats a medium on which the reactant liquid and the ink have landed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS10160197B2Printing apparatus and printing system
Publication Date: 2018.12.25 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US10160197B2 patent drawing
  • US10160197B2 patent drawing
  • US10160197B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A printing apparatus includes a liquid ejecting section that is capable of ejecting a reactant liquid and an ink, and a control section that controls operation of the liquid ejecting section. The control section sets an ejection duty of the reactant liquid according to an ejection duty of the ink.