Additive Printing Sequence Optimization via In-Situ Thermography

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The powder bed fusion (PBF) process in additive manufacturing faces challenges in minimizing thermally induced abnormalities such as warpage, delamination, and cracks, due to thermal evolution and gradients, which current methods fail to address optimally and in real-time without slowing down the printing process.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize real-time thermographic imaging and mathematical thermophysical-based models to optimize the printing sequence of islands or stripes, ensuring an optimal uniform temperature distribution across each layer, thereby mitigating thermally induced residual stress and thermal distortion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If real-time temperature monitoring and printing sequence optimization are implemented to minimize thermal gradients, then thermal abnormalities and defects are reduced, but the printing process time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal uniformityVSAvoidprinting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculation of optimized printing sequences before actual printing based on CAD model analysis. By pre-determining the optimal printing path that minimizes thermal gradients, the system avoids real-time computational delays during the printing process while still achieving improved thermal uniformity and reduced defects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the printing sequence based on real-time temperature monitoring feedback. The printing path is not fixed but adapts during the process to maintain optimal thermal conditions, allowing the system to respond to actual thermal conditions while maintaining productivity through efficient adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If traditional printing sequences are used without optimization, then printing speed is maintained, but thermal gradients cause warpage, delamination, and cracks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting speedVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time temperature monitoring during the printing process and uses this feedback to detect thermal gradients and abnormalities. This feedback mechanism allows the system to identify conditions that lead to warpage, delamination, and cracks, and adjust printing parameters accordingly to maintain structural integrity while preserving printing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-calculates optimized printing sequences that are specifically designed to minimize thermal gradients and prevent thermal abnormalities. By determining the optimal printing path before manufacturing begins, the system proactively prevents structural defects rather than reacting to them, maintaining both high printing speed and structural reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves a more homogeneous temperature distribution throughout printed layers, reducing thermal defects and allowing for real-time control without slowing down the additive manufacturing process, thereby improving the robustness and quality of 3D printed objects.

Implementation Method 1

The thermal source fuses the powdered print material, for example by melting and/or sintering

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 2

The thermal source fuses the powdered print material, for example by melting and/or sintering

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 3

a thermographic imaging device for obtaining thermographic image data of a macro thermal field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation: Thermal Radiation

Data Source

PatentUS20250153443A1Systems and methods for monitoring and controlling additive printing processes
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIV
  • US20250153443A1 patent drawing
  • US20250153443A1 patent drawing
  • US20250153443A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Monitoring and control system and method for additive manufacturing an in-situ macro-field thermography that uses an IR camera or near-IR camera to prioritize the data captured from an entire print layer, processes data streams layer-by-layer, and provides thermal history of previously printed layers as feedback to the control system. The system leverages one or more different mathematical thermophysical-based (MTB) models to compute a thermally related specification in order to optimize the printing sequence of islands or stripes layer-by-layer. The thermal feedback from the thermography system calibrates or updates the thermal model layer-by-layer. The system and/or method may provide real-time optimization of scanning topology in chessboard and stripe printing strategies. The method may be implemented by one or more computer programs controlling one or more computer controllers of an additive manufacturing system, such as a 3D printer implementing a metal powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process.