Independent Printing Unit Control for Error Resilience

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Printing devices with multiple platens face efficiency losses when an error occurs, as the entire operation must stop, leading to reduced productivity due to the need to halt print operations on all units.

Innovation Solution

A printing device with independent control units for each platen, allowing one unit to continue operation even if an error occurs in another, utilizing separate print heads, feeding mechanisms, and ink cartridges, with notification systems to inform the operator of status and errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple platens are arranged horizontally on the same plane with one print head, then print efficiency is improved through successive printing, but when an error occurs to one platen or carriage, all print operations must be stopped

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprint efficiencyVSAvoidoperational continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The printing device is divided into multiple independent printing units, each comprising a print head, carriage, platen, and control unit. Each printing unit operates autonomously, so that when an error occurs in one unit, other units can continue printing without interruption. This segmentation transforms a single-point-failure system into a multi-point-operational system, resolving the contradiction between improved productivity and maintained reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each printing unit is equipped with its own dedicated control unit that independently manages that specific unit's operations. This local control architecture allows error isolation, where a fault in one unit's control unit does not propagate to other units. The local quality principle enables each unit to maintain its operational status independently, preserving overall system reliability while benefiting from multiple simultaneous printing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If a single control unit manages multiple printing units, then device complexity is reduced, but when an error occurs, all printing units must stop operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol structureVSAvoidprint operation continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into multiple independent control units, each dedicated to managing a specific printing unit. This segmentation eliminates the single-point-failure risk associated with centralized control, as each control unit operates independently. The increased structural complexity is justified by the significant gain in operational continuity and productivity, as errors in one control unit do not affect other units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each printing unit is equipped with its own intermediary control unit that acts as a local mediator between the print head, carriage, and platen. This distributed control architecture allows each unit to autonomously handle errors and continue operation, preventing system-wide stoppages. The intermediary control units enable localized decision-making that preserves overall system productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If one print head feeds ink to multiple platens, then device complexity is reduced, but ink supply reliability to each platen deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveink supply structureVSAvoidink supply reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The ink supply system is segmented into dedicated ink cartridges for each printing unit. Each print head has its own ink cartridge, eliminating shared ink supply paths that could cause cross-contamination or supply failures. This segmentation ensures that ink supply issues in one unit do not affect other units, maintaining high reliability while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each printing unit is equipped with its own dedicated ink cartridge and ink supply mechanism, tailored to the specific requirements of that unit. This local quality approach ensures optimized ink flow and pressure control for each printing operation, preventing ink supply failures that could propagate across multiple platens. The dedicated ink supply system enhances reliability while maintaining manageable device complexity through standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2052869B1Printing device, control method and program thereof
Publication Date: 2013.05.22 BROTHER KOGYO KK
  • EP2052869B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2052869B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2052869B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A printing device comprises first and second print heads, first and second print head control units, a first print head feeding unit moving the first print head in a main scanning direction, a second print head feeding unit moving the second print head in the main scanning direction, a first medium feeding unit moving a first medium holding unit in an auxiliary scanning direction orthogonal to the main scanning direction, a second medium feeding unit moving a second medium holding unit in the auxiliary scanning direction in parallel with the movement of the first medium feeding unit, a first printing unit control unit (controlling the first print head control unit, the first print head feeding unit and the first medium feeding unit), and a second printing unit control unit (controlling the second print head control unit, the second print head feeding unit and the second medium feeding unit).