Printing Vehicle Hexagonal Raster Ink Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The industrial print industry faces challenges such as high capital costs, sensitivity to mechanical tolerances, limited flexibility in print size and substrate type, and inefficiencies in ink usage, leading to increased costs and reduced productivity due to the need for large and complex printing systems.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a novel printing system utilizing a hexagonal raster and multiple non-orthogonal printing directions, enabled by a self-contained printing vehicle (APV) that can traverse and print on various substrates with enhanced nozzle usage and ink efficiency, reducing the number of nozzles required and allowing for flexible print sizes and orientations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the number of print heads is increased to achieve higher throughput, then productivity is improved, but system cost and device complexity increase disproportionately

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The printing system is divided into multiple independent printing vehicles (APVs), each capable of autonomous operation. Each APV contains its own print heads, ink delivery system, and control electronics, allowing the system to scale by adding independent units rather than expanding a single complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-dimensional linear array of print heads to a two-dimensional array of printing vehicles operating in parallel. Multiple APVs can print simultaneously on different sections of the substrate, achieving higher throughput through spatial parallelism rather than simply adding more nozzles to a single carriage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If the nozzle array length is increased to improve productivity, then throughput increases, but manufacturing precision requirements and costs increase non-linearly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoiddot placement tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous nozzle array is segmented into multiple discrete printing vehicles, each with its own compact nozzle array. This segmentation reduces the length of individual nozzle arrays, thereby reducing the cumulative tolerance stacking and mechanical precision requirements while maintaining overall system throughput through parallel operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each printing vehicle is equipped with sensors and control systems that provide real-time feedback on nozzle performance, dot placement accuracy, and substrate position. This feedback enables dynamic compensation for variations, reducing the need for ultra-tight manufacturing tolerances on individual components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multi-pass printing is used to improve print quality, then print quality increases, but productivity decreases due to increased printing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprint qualityVSAvoidprinting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The printing task is segmented across multiple printing vehicles operating in parallel, each handling a portion of the substrate. This allows the system to achieve high print quality through adequate passes while maintaining productivity by having multiple vehicles work simultaneously, effectively distributing the multi-pass requirement across parallel streams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of manufacture

If standard rectangular raster printing is used, then ease of manufacture is maintained, but ink usage efficiency and print quality are suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidink consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs hexagonal or staggered nozzle arrangements instead of traditional rectangular grids. This asymmetric configuration optimizes dot coverage and reduces ink consumption by improving the geometric efficiency of dot placement, while the modular APV design keeps the system manufacturable through standardized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows dynamic adjustment of printing parameters including nozzle selection, print direction, and raster patterns. By optimizing these parameters for each specific printing task, the system achieves better ink efficiency and print quality without sacrificing ease of manufacture, as the same hardware can be reconfigured for different requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240109356A1Systems and methods for improved printing
Publication Date: 2024.04.04 DIVERGENTECH LLC
  • US20240109356A1 patent drawing
  • US20240109356A1 patent drawing
  • US20240109356A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A novel printing system and associated printing methods that can overcome many of the obstacles presented by today's printing systems. In certain embodiments a printing vehicle is presented that may work in cooperation with other vehicles to produce a system capable of delivering a wide range of productivity and scale. This printing system is amenable to novel printing methods that can reduce printing defects and ink consumption by up to 30%.