Prioritized TXOP Sharing for Low-Latency Wireless
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current 802.11 wireless communication technologies face challenges with channel access delay and variation, making them undesirable for low-latency applications like gaming and virtual reality due to high latency and jitter issues.
Innovation Solution
Implementing a novel shared transmission type of trigger frame that allows a host station to allocate unused transmission resources to guest stations, enabling efficient reallocation of air link resources among wireless stations and prioritizing transmission opportunities to reduce latency and jitter.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Loss of time
If traditional 802.11 channel access methods are used, then backward compatibility is maintained, but latency and jitter increase making them unsuitable for low-latency applications
Solution Approach 1:
The transmission opportunity is segmented into different priority classes (high priority and low priority TXOPs). High priority TXOPs are allocated exclusively to high priority traffic, while low priority TXOPs serve best effort traffic. This segmentation eliminates the need for high priority traffic to wait in a queue, thereby reducing latency and jitter while maintaining backward compatibility with traditional 802.11 mechanisms.
Solution Approach 2:
The system dynamically switches between high priority and low priority transmission modes based on the presence of high priority traffic. When high priority traffic is detected, the system transitions to high priority TXOP mode with exclusive access. When only low priority traffic is present, the system uses traditional low priority TXOP mode. This dynamic adaptation optimizes latency performance without compromising overall system productivity.
2Productivity
If transmission opportunities are shared among multiple stations, then throughput is improved, but channel access delay and jitter increase
Solution Approach 1:
The shared transmission opportunity is segmented into high priority and low priority portions. High priority stations receive dedicated TXOPs with guaranteed access, while low priority stations share remaining opportunities. This segmentation allows high priority traffic to achieve low latency while low priority traffic benefits from the increased overall throughput enabled by multi-station sharing.
Solution Approach 2:
Different quality levels of service are provided to different traffic types within the same transmission opportunity. High priority traffic receives guaranteed latency performance (local quality), while low priority traffic receives best effort service. This local differentiation maintains high throughput for the system while ensuring low latency for critical applications.
3Reliability
If legacy 802.11 frame formats are used, then compatibility is maintained, but low latency application requirements cannot be met
Solution Approach 1:
The frame format is segmented into a common legacy preamble (for compatibility) and a new high priority indication field. The common preamble maintains compatibility with existing 802.11 devices, while the new field enables low latency operation for high priority traffic. This segmentation allows the system to maintain reliability through compatibility while achieving low latency performance.
Solution Approach 2:
Instead of modifying existing frames to add latency reduction features, the invention inverts the approach by using a trigger frame mechanism that schedules transmissions before they occur. The trigger frame includes high priority indications that preemptively reserve resources, inverting the traditional approach of modifying data frames during transmission.
4Productivity
If transmission resources are allocated to all stations, then resource utilization is maximized, but latency-sensitive traffic experiences increased delay
Solution Approach 1:
Transmission resources are segmented into high priority and low priority allocation pools. High priority stations are allocated dedicated resources with guaranteed access, while low priority stations share remaining resources. This segmentation maximizes overall resource utilization by allowing all stations to transmit simultaneously in different pools, while ensuring low latency for high priority traffic through dedicated allocation.
Solution Approach 2:
The resource allocation is dynamically adjusted based on traffic conditions. When high priority traffic is present, the system dynamically shifts resources to guarantee low latency performance. When only low priority traffic is present, the system maximizes resource utilization by allowing all stations to share opportunities. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between utilization and latency.
Data Source
AI summary
Methods and apparatus for supporting prioritized transmission opportunity (TXOP) sharing in wireless communications systems, e.g., various 802.11 wireless communications systems, are described. A wireless station may be allocated a transmission opportunity. A shared transmission type of trigger frame is implemented, which allows the wireless station, acting as a host station, to make available transmission resources, which have been acquired by the wireless station, to one or more guest stations. A trigger based (TB) frame, corresponding to the transmitted shared transmission type trigger frame, is used by the host station and one or more guest stations to transmit data to an access point. An access point transmits priority information, e.g., in management frames, to control the use of shared resources in TB frames corresponding to shared transmission type trigger frames. The priority information identifies which particular stations are authorized to be a guest station corresponding to a particular transmission opportunity.


