Priority-Based RAID Rebuild for Data Storage Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Data storage systems using RAID technology face performance degradation during read requests for high priority data during the rebuild process, leading to potential data loss and increased latency.

Innovation Solution

The system organizes data into RAID extents with initial and subsequent rebuilding passes, prioritizing high priority RAID stripes for immediate recovery, using high priority block counters and flags to identify and recover critical data first, and maintaining bitmaps to track priority changes during the rebuild process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a complete RAID rebuild process is performed to recover all data from failed drives, then data reliability is improved, but read request latency increases and system performance degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata reliabilityVSAvoidread request latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The rebuild process is segmented into multiple passes, with each pass handling specific priority levels of data. The system performs initial rebuilding passes for high priority data and subsequent passes for lower priority data, allowing read requests to be served from recovered high priority data while lower priority data recovery continues in background passes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary identification and prioritization of high priority data before the rebuild process begins. By pre-marking critical data with high priority block flags and counters, the system ensures that most critical data is recovered first during initial rebuilding passes, reducing read latency for essential operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If all RAID stripes are rebuilt simultaneously, then data completeness is improved, but system productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoidsystem productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Different RAID stripes are assigned different recovery priorities based on their importance. High priority RAID stripes with critical data are processed during initial rebuilding passes, while lower priority stripes are handled in subsequent passes. This local differentiation of recovery quality ensures system productivity is maintained for critical operations while completeness is achieved for all data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The rebuild process uses periodic passing through different RAID extents multiple times. Each pass focuses on specific priority levels, with the system periodically revisiting and processing different portions of data. This periodic action allows progressive recovery of data while maintaining system responsiveness during each pass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Speed

If high priority data is recovered immediately, then read request performance is improved, but rebuild complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveread request performanceVSAvoidrebuild process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by maintaining high priority block counters and flags for each RAID stripe during normal operation. These pre-computed priority indicators are stored in metadata structures, allowing the rebuild process to immediately identify and prioritize critical data without complex real-time analysis, thus improving read performance while limiting complexity increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where high priority block counters and recovered flags provide continuous information about data priority and recovery status. This feedback allows the rebuild process to dynamically adjust its focus between passes, improving read performance for critical data while managing complexity through structured feedback-driven decision making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12073081B2Priority based raid (redundant array of independent disks) rebuild for a data storage system
Publication Date: 2024.08.27 DELL PROD LP
  • US12073081B2 patent drawing
  • US12073081B2 patent drawing
  • US12073081B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Non-volatile data storage of a data storage system is organized into multiple RAID extents. Each RAID extent contains multiple logically contiguous RAID stripes. In response to detecting a failed drive in the data storage system, an initial rebuilding pass is performed on each one of the RAID extents. The initial rebuilding pass recovers data that was previously stored on the failed drive and was located within high priority RAID stripes in the RAID extent. After the initial rebuilding pass is completed on all of the RAID extents, at least one subsequent rebuilding pass is performed on each one of the RAID extents. The subsequent rebuilding pass recovers data that was previously stored on the failed drive and was located within RAID stripes in the RAID extent that are not high priority.