Priority-Based Content Retrieval for Entertainment Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional entertainment systems face challenges in efficiently downloading files, particularly when large files or updates are required, as they often consume bandwidth for extended periods, potentially disrupting consumer experience and revenue generation.

Innovation Solution

A priority-based content retrieval mechanism that prioritizes scheduled entertainment content over unscheduled content, allowing for higher priority downloads to interrupt lower-priority ones and manage file queues based on urgency, ensuring timely delivery of consumer-requested content without disrupting ongoing downloads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If large files such as video files or major software updates are downloaded using broadband connection, then the download speed is improved, but the connection bandwidth is fully consumed for extended periods, disrupting consumer experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedownload speedVSAvoidconsumer experience
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts download priorities based on real-time conditions. When a high-priority download is detected, the system interrupts ongoing low-priority downloads and reallocates bandwidth dynamically to ensure timely delivery of consumer-requested content while maintaining service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-establishes priority levels for different download types before bandwidth conflicts occur. Scheduled entertainment content is marked as high-priority and consumer-requested content as highest-priority, enabling preemptive resource allocation before bandwidth exhaustion disrupts consumer experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If files are downloaded during business hours to provide timely content, then consumer experience is improved, but revenue is lost due to interruption of service to customers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsumer experienceVSAvoidrevenue loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between download modes based on operational context. During business hours, it prioritizes consumer-requested content downloads that can be served immediately, while scheduling bulk content updates during off-peak hours, thereby maintaining service continuity and revenue generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary content updates during off-peak hours before business hours begin, so that when consumers make requests during operational hours, the content is already available or can be downloaded quickly without interrupting service, thus preventing revenue loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of energy

If content updates are performed during off-peak hours to avoid interrupting service, then revenue is protected, but the window of time for file transfer is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue protectionVSAvoiddownload time window
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments download operations into high-priority consumer-requested content and low-priority bulk updates. By handling these differently, the system can perform critical updates during off-peak hours while maintaining the ability to quickly serve consumer requests during business hours without being constrained by the limited off-peak time window.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary assessment and queuing of update tasks during off-peak hours, organizing them by priority and estimating required bandwidth. This preliminary organization allows efficient execution within the limited time window while ensuring that critical updates are completed before business hours begin.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If bandwidth is allocated to large file downloads, then download completion is achieved, but the connection is fully consumed for extended periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedownload completionVSAvoidconnection usage duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic bandwidth management that monitors download progress in real-time. When a download approaches completion or when high-priority content is detected, the system dynamically adjusts bandwidth allocation to reduce connection usage duration for low-priority downloads while ensuring timely completion of critical transfers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary classification of download tasks by size, priority, and urgency before bandwidth allocation begins. This preliminary sorting enables the system to allocate bandwidth efficiently, completing critical downloads quickly with minimal connection usage duration while scheduling larger less-critical downloads to complete later.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8099482B2Prioritized content download for an entertainment device
Publication Date: 2012.01.17 AMI ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK LLC
  • US8099482B2 patent drawing
  • US8099482B2 patent drawing
  • US8099482B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Priority-based content retrieval mechanisms for digital entertainment devices are provided. In various embodiments, the download prioritizations may be interrupt-based, sequence-based, or a combination of the two. In interrupt-based prioritizations, a higher priority download request will interrupt a lower-priority download that is already in progress. In sequence-based prioritizations, a plurality of file download requests may be ordered in a download queue depending on the priority of the request, with higher priority requests being positioned towards the top of the queue and lower priority requests being positioned towards the bottom of the queue.