Priority Determination System for Moving Bodies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing priority determination systems for IT system anomalies do not consider risk values, leading to potential ignoring of high-risk anomalies and difficulty in prioritizing alerts across multiple targets during attacks.

Innovation Solution

A priority determination system that includes anomaly and state data processing to calculate risk values and determine task priorities based on these values, incorporating factors like vehicle type, location, and traffic state to ensure timely alert prioritization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If priority determination is based on occurrence origin or frequency of alerts, then operator notification accuracy is improved, but high-risk anomalies may be ignored and alerts across multiple targets cannot be prioritized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator notification accuracyVSAvoidhigh-risk anomaly detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter basis for priority determination from occurrence origin/frequency to risk value. The risk value is calculated by multiplying the alert level (from anomaly type) by a state value (from moving body state), transforming the priority determination criterion to capture both anomaly severity and contextual risk factors, thereby resolving the contradiction between notification accuracy and high-risk anomaly detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a new dimension to priority determination by incorporating the state of the moving body (location, traffic state, vehicle type) as a multiplicative factor. This dimensional expansion allows the system to evaluate alerts not just by their intrinsic properties but also by their contextual impact, enabling proper prioritization across multiple targets during attacks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If multiple alerts are processed without risk value calculation, then processing speed is maintained, but prioritization across multiple targets becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert processing speedVSAvoidalert prioritization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary calculation of risk values by pre-establishing the relationship between alert levels and moving body states. The risk value calculator computes priorities in advance based on available data, allowing the system to maintain processing speed while enabling effective prioritization when multiple alerts need to be handled, as the computational framework is already in place

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12153960B2Priority determination system, priority determination method, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2024.11.26 PANASONIC AUTOMOTIVE SYST CO LTD
  • US12153960B2 patent drawing
  • US12153960B2 patent drawing
  • US12153960B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A priority determination system incudes a processor, a terminal, and a memory. The processor obtains anomaly data items, each indicating an anomaly in a corresponding one of moving bodies, and obtains state data items, each indicating a state of a corresponding one of the moving bodies. The processor calculates, for each anomaly data item, a risk value indicating a risk of the anomaly based on a state data item of the corresponding one of the moving bodies, determines a priority of a task for dealing with the anomaly indicated by each anomaly data item based on the risk value, and provides an output to the terminal to execute the task. The terminal displays an alert related to at least one of the priority of the task, the risk value, or an estimated dealing time required for completing the task.