Priority-Based Preemption Control for Wireless Channel Resources

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face inefficiencies due to unnecessary preemption and cancellation of channels without considering priority, leading to increased latency and resource mismanagement.

Innovation Solution

A method where a base station configures user equipment (UE) to apply preemption indications based on channel priority, using parameters in configuration messages to determine operation states for downlink preemption and uplink cancellation, thereby optimizing the use of time-frequency resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If preemption indication is applied without considering channel priority, then resource allocation flexibility is improved, but latency increases and resource management efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation flexibilityVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different preemption handling rules to different channels based on their priority levels. High-priority channels (e.g., URLLC) are exempt from preemption while low-priority channels (e.g., eMBB) are subject to preemption when resources are needed for higher-priority traffic. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by making resource allocation flexible where needed while protecting time-critical channels from preemption-induced latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically determines whether to apply preemption indication based on the priority of the affected channel. The base station evaluates channel priority levels and selectively applies preemption only to appropriate channels, creating a dynamic resource allocation mechanism that adapts to different service requirements and avoids unnecessary latency for high-priority traffic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If preemption indication is applied without considering channel priority, then resource utilization is improved, but resource management efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoidresource management efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements priority-based preemption where the base station evaluates channel priority before applying preemption indication. High-priority channels are protected while low-priority channels can be preempted, ensuring that resource management decisions are made with awareness of service requirements. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining efficient resource utilization while preventing mismanagement of time-critical resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates channel priority information as feedback in the preemption decision-making process. The base station uses knowledge of channel priorities to intelligently determine which channels should be preempted, creating a feedback mechanism that improves resource management efficiency while maintaining high resource utilization through selective preemption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If operation state parameter is added to configuration message, then priority-based preemption control is improved, but signaling overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepriority-based preemption controlVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an operation state parameter that can take different values to indicate different preemption behaviors (e.g., apply preemption to all channels vs. apply preemption only to low-priority channels). This parameter-based approach provides flexible priority-based control while minimizing signaling overhead by using a compact indicator rather than extensive configuration messages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11902998B2Priority indication for downlink preemption and uplink cancellation
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 QUALCOMM INC
  • US11902998B2 patent drawing
  • US11902998B2 patent drawing
  • US11902998B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. The methods, systems, and devices may enable a base station to determine an operation state for a user equipment (UE) that corresponds to how the UE applies a preemption indication. The base station may indicate the operation state to the UE using a parameter of a configuration message. The base station may transmit a grant indicating time-frequency resources scheduled for the UE. The UE may identify a priority of a channel associated with the scheduled resources. The base station may determine a number of scheduled resources to be preempted or canceled and may indicate these resources to the UE using a preemption indication. The UE may determine remaining time-frequency resources based on the preemption indication, the priority of the channels, the operation state, or a combination thereof.