Priority Queue Routing for Sensitive Digital Content Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems lack efficiency in processing large volumes of digital data due to varying system requirements frameworks, leading to high latency and increased security risks for sensitive data, especially when multiple data types and sources are involved.

Innovation Solution

A queue priority management system that classifies digital content items based on system requirements frameworks, routing them to priority-based processing queues for timely and secure processing, including operations like redacting or encrypting sensitive data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional systems process large volumes of digital data without priority-based routing, then all data is processed in a uniform manner, but processing latency increases and security risks elevate for sensitive data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidprocessing latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the single processing queue into multiple priority-based processing queues (high priority, medium priority, low priority queues). This segmentation allows sensitive data to be routed to high priority queues for immediate processing while less critical data proceeds through lower priority queues, thereby reducing overall processing latency without compromising security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by treating different data items differently based on their sensitivity and priority classification. High priority data receives expedited processing with dedicated computational resources, while low priority data receives standard processing. This differentiated approach ensures that security-critical data is processed promptly without holding up the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If conventional systems process all data types uniformly, then resource allocation is simple, but efficiency decreases when handling diverse data types with varying requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of incoming digital data items into different priority categories before routing them to appropriate processing queues. This preliminary action of classifying data based on sensitivity and requirements enables efficient resource allocation and processing without requiring complex real-time decision-making during the processing phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the routing parameter from uniform processing to priority-based processing by introducing classification parameters (high, medium, low priority). This parameter change allows the system to adapt resource allocation and processing speed based on data characteristics, significantly improving productivity for diverse data types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If systems re-process large amounts of data to address changes in system requirements frameworks, then compliance is maintained, but time and computing resources are significantly consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecomplianceVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of data according to system requirements frameworks and priority categories before processing. This preliminary classification enables the system to quickly identify and route compliance-critical data to appropriate queues, maintaining compliance without requiring complete re-processing of all data when framework changes occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different processing qualities to different data items based on their classification. Data items with higher priority and compliance requirements receive more rigorous and prompt processing, while less critical data receives standard processing. This localized quality approach maintains compliance for critical data without unnecessarily consuming resources on non-critical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250355702A1Routing digital content items to priority-based processing queues according to priority classifications of the digital content items
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 ONETRUST LLC
  • US20250355702A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355702A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355702A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and non-transitory computer readable storage media are disclosed for routing digital content items to priority-based processing queues based on classifications of the digital content items according to one or more system requirements frameworks. Specifically, the disclosed system scans and classifies digital content items at a digital data repository based on data types included in the digital content items. The disclosed system utilizes a classification model with a classification profile to classify the digital content items according to one or more system requirements frameworks and routes the digital content items to priority-based processing queues according to priority levels indicated by the classifications. Furthermore, the disclosed system provides indications of classifications of the portions of the digital content items (e.g., to indicate high priority data). The disclosed system can also perform additional computing operations on the digital content items according to the routing via the priority-based processing queues.