Priority-Based Resource Allocation for Inter-Cell Interference Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, inter-cell interference occurs due to different traffic types having varying priorities, leading to undesirable performance in cells sharing the same band or sub-band, particularly affecting mission-critical communication which requires high reliability and low latency.

Innovation Solution

The system determines traffic priorities and assigns specific resource sets to each type of traffic, using a priority-based resource allocation scheme that divides the frequency band into sub-bands to mitigate interference, ensuring that high-priority traffic, such as mission-critical communication, is prioritized over lower-priority traffic, and coordinates resource allocation between adjacent cells to prevent overlap and reduce interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If resources are shared between adjacent cells to improve spectral efficiency, then system capacity increases, but inter-cell interference increases causing performance degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoidinter-cell interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The frequency spectrum is segmented into multiple sub-bands, and each sub-band is further divided into resource blocks. Different priority traffic types are allocated to different sub-bands or resource blocks, allowing simultaneous transmission while reducing inter-cell interference through frequency domain separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different quality of service levels are applied locally to different traffic types within the same cell. High-priority traffic (e.g., mission-critical communications) receives preferential resource allocation and protection from interference, while low-priority traffic accepts lower quality levels, enabling differentiated service quality across the network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If transmit power is reduced to yield to adjacent cell users, then inter-cell interference is reduced, but signal quality and data rate deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinter-cell interferenceVSAvoidsignal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The solution moves from power control in the time domain to resource allocation in the frequency domain. By assigning different frequency resources to different priority traffic and coordinating between adjacent cells, the system achieves interference mitigation without requiring transmit power reduction, thereby maintaining signal quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If priority-based resource allocation is implemented to protect mission-critical traffic, then reliability of high-priority traffic improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemission-critical communication reliabilityVSAvoidresource allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The resource allocation process is segmented into hierarchical levels: first dividing spectrum into sub-bands, then into resource blocks, and finally allocating specific resource blocks to different priority traffic types. This structured segmentation simplifies the allocation logic compared to exhaustive optimization methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of resource allocation from equal treatment to priority-based differential allocation. By introducing priority levels as a new parameter, the system can automatically differentiate resource distribution without requiring complex real-time negotiation between cells.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-affected harmful factors

If frequency band is divided into sub-bands for priority traffic separation, then inter-cell interference is mitigated, but spectral efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinter-cell interferenceVSAvoidspectral efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of completely isolating different priority traffic in separate frequency bands, the system applies partial separation by allocating specific resource blocks within sub-bands. This partial action approach maintains sufficient frequency diversity to reduce interference while utilizing most of the available spectrum, avoiding the excessive action of complete band separation that would waste spectral resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10469218B2Inter-cell interference mitigation for traffic according to priority
Publication Date: 2019.11.05 QUALCOMM INC
  • US10469218B2 patent drawing
  • US10469218B2 patent drawing
  • US10469218B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Traffic in a first cell may experience interference from or may cause interference to traffic in an adjacent cell, which may lead to undesirable performance in one or both of the first cell and the adjacent cell. For example, a user equipment (UE) near an edge of the first cell may experience appreciable interference based on the reuse of resources. Accordingly, for transmissions in adjacent cells over a same band or sub-band, one UE may need to reduce transmit power in order to yield to another UE in an adjacent cells. An apparatus may be configured to determine first traffic associated with a first priority and second traffic associated with a second priority. The apparatus may be further configured to assign, based on the first priority and second priority, a first set of resources to the first traffic and a second set of resources to the second traffic.