Priority-Based Sidelink Coordination to Reduce Transmission Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sidelink communication systems in wireless networks face challenges in efficiently coordinating resource allocation and data transmission between devices, leading to suboptimal performance and interference.

Innovation Solution

Implementing sidelink inter-UE coordination mechanisms that facilitate coordinated resource selection and information exchange between wireless devices, optimizing transmission parameters to enhance network efficiency and reduce interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If sidelink communication is implemented without inter-UE coordination, then device autonomy and simplicity are maintained, but resource utilization efficiency deteriorates and interference increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidcoordination mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces coordination information as an intermediary mechanism between requesting and coordinating UEs. This coordination information, transmitted via PSCCH or PDSCH, serves as a mediator that enables resource allocation optimization without requiring complex direct negotiation between UEs. The coordination information contains resource allocation suggestions that resolve the contradiction by providing structured guidance while maintaining relative simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where coordination information is transmitted from coordinating UE to requesting UE, and acknowledgment information is sent back from requesting UE to coordinating UE. This feedback loop enables continuous optimization of resource allocation, improving resource utilization efficiency while keeping the coordination mechanism manageable through standardized feedback procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If coordination information transmission is implemented, then interference between sidelink transmissions is reduced, but network overhead and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference between transmissionsVSAvoidnetwork overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by implementing coordination only when beneficial - requesting UEs can opt-in to coordination based on their needs, and coordination information is transmitted selectively rather than universally. This approach reduces unnecessary overhead while still providing interference mitigation where it matters most, balancing the trade-off between interference reduction and overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The coordination mechanism is segmented into distinct functional components: coordination information transmission (via PSCCH or PDSCH), acknowledgment information, and resource allocation decisions. This segmentation allows the system to implement only the necessary coordination functions, reducing overall overhead while maintaining effective interference mitigation through targeted coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple coordination information transmissions are performed, then resource allocation accuracy is improved, but transmission latency and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation accuracyVSAvoidcoordination latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by having coordinating UEs prepare and transmit coordination information in advance of actual data transmission. Resource allocation suggestions are provided beforehand, allowing requesting UEs to plan their transmissions proactively. This reduces the need for multiple iterative exchanges, improving allocation accuracy while minimizing latency through advance planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12464523B2Sidelink coordination information transmissions/receptions
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 OFINNO LLC
  • US12464523B2 patent drawing
  • US12464523B2 patent drawing
  • US12464523B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless device receives a message configuring one or more time intervals for transmitting coordination information to a second wireless device, where the coordination information indicates a set of resources for one or more sidelink transmissions by the second wireless device. The wireless device selects, from the one or more time intervals, a time interval based on at least a priority level of the one or more sidelink transmissions. The wireless device transmits, to the second wireless device, first coordination information indicating a first set of resources for the one or more sidelink transmissions. The wireless device transmits, to the second wireless device and based on the time interval, second coordination information indicating a second set of resources for the one or more sidelink transmissions.