Priority-Based Space-Time Coding for Wireless Data Streams

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current space-time coding methods for multiple data streams in wireless communications do not efficiently allow high-priority data streams to be decoded without a significant complexity penalty from the presence of low-priority streams, especially in systems with multiple transmit antennas.

Innovation Solution

The method involves establishing priorities for data streams, determining desired signal quality based on these priorities, and selecting appropriate space-time codes and weightings to modulate and combine data streams, ensuring high-priority streams can be decoded with lower signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratios than low-priority streams without increasing decoding complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If standard space-time codes are used for multiple data streams, then data transmission reliability is improved, but decoding complexity increases significantly for high-priority streams due to the presence of low-priority streams

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission reliabilityVSAvoiddecoding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the multiple data streams into priority groups (high-priority and low-priority streams) and applies different space-time coding strategies to each group. High-priority streams use orthogonal space-time codes that can be decoded independently, while low-priority streams use non-orthogonal codes that do not interfere with high-priority stream decoding, thus reducing overall decoding complexity while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different coding qualities to different parts of the transmission system by using orthogonal codes for high-priority streams (ensuring simple, reliable decoding) and non-orthogonal codes for low-priority streams (optimizing spectral efficiency). This local differentiation allows each stream type to be optimized for its specific requirements without compromising the other

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If orthogonal space-time codes are used for all data streams, then decoding complexity is reduced, but spectral efficiency decreases due to increased resource allocation for high-priority streams

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding complexityVSAvoidspectral efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different coding schemes to different data streams based on their priority and requirements. High-priority streams use orthogonal codes for simple decoding, while low-priority streams use non-orthogonal codes that achieve better spectral efficiency. This selective approach optimizes overall system performance without sacrificing decoding simplicity for critical streams

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite coding structure by combining orthogonal and non-orthogonal space-time codes within the same transmission system. This composite approach allows the system to leverage the advantages of both coding types: the simplicity and reliability of orthogonal codes for high-priority streams, and the spectral efficiency of non-orthogonal codes for low-priority streams

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Productivity

If non-orthogonal space-time codes are used to improve spectral efficiency, then data transmission capacity increases, but interference between streams increases making decoding more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidinter-stream interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the codebook into orthogonal and non-orthogonal code sets, assigning orthogonal codes to high-priority streams to eliminate interference, and non-orthogonal codes to low-priority streams where some interference is acceptable. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high spectral efficiency overall while protecting critical streams from interference

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of inter-stream interference into a benefit by using non-orthogonal codes for low-priority streams that can tolerate some interference, while using orthogonal codes for high-priority streams that are protected from interference. The interference that would normally be harmful is instead managed strategically to optimize overall system performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS8284693B2Multi-stream priority-based space-time coding
Publication Date: 2012.10.09 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US8284693B2 patent drawing
  • US8284693B2 patent drawing
  • US8284693B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments for space-time coding are disclosed. One method includes establishing a priority for each of a plurality of data streams. A number of data bits for each of the plurality of data streams are allocated. A desired signal quality for each of the plurality of data streams is determined based on the corresponding priority. Each of the plurality of data streams are modulated according to the allocated number of data bits of each of the plurality of data streams. A space-time code is selected for each of the plurality of data streams based at least partially on the desired signal quality for each of the plurality of data streams, wherein at least one of the space-time codes is at least one of a vector or a matrix. Each of the modulated data streams are space-time coded with the selected space-time code. The space-time coded modulated data streams are summed, and transmitted.