Privacy-Constrained Conversion Model Training With Mixed Attribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Increased privacy restrictions hinder the accuracy of conversion probability models in content serving systems due to limited attribution data, making it difficult to train effective models for predicting user interactions with digital content.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilizes machine learning models trained with both attributable and un-attributable conversion event information, incorporating a privacy bias, to determine conversion probabilities and select content items for presentation in enhanced privacy environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If privacy restrictions are increased to protect user data, then user privacy is improved, but conversion probability model accuracy deteriorates due to limited attribution data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser privacy protectionVSAvoidconversion probability prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments conversion events into attributable conversion events (with identifiable user actions) and un-attributable conversion events (without direct user action identification). This segmentation allows the system to utilize both types of events for model training while respecting privacy restrictions, thereby maintaining prediction accuracy without compromising user privacy protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using a portion of available conversion data (attributable events) directly, while using another portion (un-attributable events) with modified weighting or processing. This approach allows the model to learn from all available data while appropriately accounting for the reduced reliability of un-attributable events, thus maintaining accuracy under privacy constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If only attributable conversion events are used for model training, then model accuracy is improved, but the amount of available training data deteriorates due to privacy restrictions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel prediction accuracyVSAvoidavailable training data volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing mechanism that handles un-attributable conversion events. Instead of directly using these events as reliable training data, the system processes them through a intermediary layer that applies privacy bias adjustments and weighting schemes. This intermediary approach allows the system to incorporate additional training data while maintaining model accuracy by appropriately accounting for the lower reliability of un-attributable events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If un-attributable conversion events are incorporated into training data, then the quantity of training data is improved, but data quality deteriorates due to lack of direct user action attribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining data volumeVSAvoiddata quality and reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying how un-attributable conversion events are weighted and processed during model training. Instead of treating all conversion events equally, the system adjusts parameters such as event weighting, loss function coefficients, and training sample selection criteria to account for the lower quality of un-attributable events. This allows the system to incorporate more training data while maintaining overall data quality through parameter adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250245548A1System and method for model training in enhanced privacy environments
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 YAHOO AD TECH LLC
  • US20250245548A1 patent drawing
  • US20250245548A1 patent drawing
  • US20250245548A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In an example, sets of event information associated with events may be identified. The events may include conversion events. The conversion events may comprise attributed and un-attributed conversion events, as well as aggregated conversion events. Machine learning model training may be performed, using a training set of attributable and un-attributable conversion events and a privacy bias in connection with the un-attributable conversion events, to generate a first machine learning model. Further machine learning model training may be performed, using the aggregated conversion events to generate a second machine learning model. Conversion probabilities associated with content items may be determined using the first and second machine learning models. Attributable content items may be selected for presentation via a client device based upon the conversion probabilities.