Privacy Network Trust Model for Secure Data Sharing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The traditional enterprise-centric model for IT security is inadequate in addressing the complexities of data sharing and privacy in a highly interconnected internet society, where organizations and individuals participate in a dynamic web of business processes and communication flows.

Innovation Solution

A privacy network and trust model that automatically enforces trust between organizations, ensures privacy for end users, and facilitates data exchange regulatory compliance, using blockchain technology to create a Proof of Trust BlockChain that enables precision personalization and secure data sharing on a global scale.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If enterprise-centric policy enforcement model is used to protect security and privacy, then security control is improved, but data sharing capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity controlVSAvoiddata sharing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the centralized enterprise-centric security model into a distributed network of trust anchors and policy enforcement points. Each organization maintains its own trust anchors and policy controls, enabling independent security management while participating in cross-organizational data sharing networks. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by allowing security control to be maintained at multiple distributed levels rather than requiring a single centralized authority that restricts data sharing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces privacy-preserving computation technologies and trusted execution environments as intermediaries between data holders and data users. These intermediaries enable data sharing while maintaining security controls through cryptographic proofs, secure enclaves, and policy enforcement mechanisms that prevent direct access to sensitive data. This intermediary layer resolves the contradiction by facilitating data exchange without compromising security control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If centralized trust management is implemented to enforce policies, then policy enforcement capability is improved, but system complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy enforcement capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides centralized trust management into distributed trust anchors across multiple organizations. Each trust anchor is responsible for specific policy domains, eliminating the need for a single complex centralized authority. This segmentation reduces system complexity by distributing trust management functions while maintaining policy enforcement capability through coordinated verification across the network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables organizations to self-manage their own trust anchors and policy enforcement mechanisms. Each organization can independently configure and maintain its security policies without requiring centralized configuration management. This self-service approach reduces system complexity by eliminating centralized configuration overhead while maintaining policy enforcement capability through decentralized verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If data aggregation across organizations is performed to enable personalization, then personalization capability is improved, but privacy risk deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidprivacy risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces privacy-preserving computation intermediaries that enable data aggregation for personalization without exposing raw personal data. These intermediaries use techniques such as homomorphic encryption, secure multi-party computation, and federated learning to aggregate data across organizations while maintaining privacy. This resolves the contradiction by enabling personalization capability through data aggregation while eliminating privacy risk through cryptographic protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical data collection and aggregation mechanisms with cryptographic-based privacy-preserving computation. Instead of physically collecting and centralizing data, the system uses mathematical proofs and cryptographic protocols to aggregate information while preserving privacy. This substitution resolves the contradiction by enabling personalization through computational aggregation without the privacy risks associated with data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12316610B1Privacy network and unified trust model for privacy preserving computation and policy enforcement
Publication Date: 2025.05.27 WEBSHIELD INC
  • US12316610B1 patent drawing
  • US12316610B1 patent drawing
  • US12316610B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A privacy network and unified trust model runs privacy algorithms that can completely obfuscate any data or rendering the data opaque and meaningless so they can be freely aggregated and shared without risk of security or privacy breach. The obfuscated algorithms can be applied to obfuscated data to produce obfuscated output. The obfuscated output is identical to what would have been produced had the algorithms been applied to data and then obfuscated with the same privacy algorithm. Information from disparate sources is virtually aggregated, linked, analyzed, transformed and used without revealing any meaningful information to any person or any system—even to the processors performing the computation.