Privacy Score Computation via Entity Connection Weighting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing content editing tools pose a risk of inadvertently disclosing sensitive information, which can be rapidly disseminated and aggregated to reveal personally identifying information, leading to privacy concerns as users share content online.

Innovation Solution

The use of domain-specific neural networks and machine learning models to identify entities in media data, compute a privacy score based on connections between these entities, and output recommended actions to mitigate the risk of sensitive data exposure, such as modifying content items to reduce privacy risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If content editing tools allow users to share content online, then user freedom of expression and communication is improved, but the risk of inadvertent disclosure of sensitive information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser freedom of expressionVSAvoidprivacy risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of content before it is published online. Domain-specific neural networks scan media data, identify entities, and compute privacy scores to detect potential sensitive information disclosure risks in advance, allowing users to modify content before sharing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer between the user and the online publication process. The privacy monitoring system acts as a mediator that analyzes content, identifies privacy risks, and provides recommendations, allowing users to maintain freedom of expression while being alerted to potential harmful disclosures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system analyzes media data to identify entities and compute privacy scores, then privacy protection is improved, but computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex privacy analysis task into multiple specialized domain-specific neural networks, each trained to recognize particular entity types (e.g., faces, locations, objects). This segmentation allows parallel processing and distributes computational load while maintaining comprehensive privacy protection through multiple specialized models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If the system uses domain-specific neural networks to identify entities, then detection accuracy is improved, but the number of models and system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveentity detection accuracyVSAvoidnumber of models
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a universal framework where multiple domain-specific neural networks share common architectural components and processing infrastructure. These specialized models are integrated into a unified system that processes different media types (images, video, audio) through a common pipeline, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high detection accuracy through specialized training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12047355B2Machine learning techniques for mitigating aggregate exposure of identifying information
Publication Date: 2024.07.23 ADOBE INC
  • US12047355B2 patent drawing
  • US12047355B2 patent drawing
  • US12047355B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods mitigate aggregate exposure of identifying information using machine learning. A privacy monitoring system identifies entities and corresponding entity types by applying a set of domain-specific neural networks, each trained to recognize a particular entity type, to media data extracted from two or more content items associated with a user. The privacy monitoring system computes a privacy score indicating a cumulative privacy risk for potential exposure of identifying information associated with the user from the two or more content items by identifying connections between the identified entities. The connections between the entities are weighted according to the entity types and contribute to the privacy score. A reporting subsystem outputs an indication of a recommended action for mitigating the cumulative privacy risk.