Privacy Score Generation for Third-Party Data Risk Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face challenges in monitoring and understanding their privacy posture due to the complexity of data sharing across multiple third-party service providers, with many providers lacking transparency in their data-sharing practices.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for data collection analysis that generates data privacy scores based on various privacy risk factors, including legal document analysis, API analysis, and user privacy preferences, to assess the privacy risk of third-party service providers and provide users with a user interface to monitor their privacy posture.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If users monitor privacy posture across multiple third-party service providers, then privacy awareness and control improve, but system complexity and monitoring difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex privacy monitoring task into distinct components: a data collection module that gathers privacy information from multiple third-party service providers, a privacy score generator that processes this information separately for each provider, and a presentation module that displays individual and aggregate scores. This segmentation allows the system to manage complexity by dividing the monitoring function across specialized components rather than requiring a monolithic solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a privacy score as an intermediary metric that simplifies the complex relationship between users and third-party service providers. Instead of requiring users to directly analyze complex privacy policies and data sharing practices, the system generates intermediate privacy scores that encapsulate this complexity, making it easier for users to understand and compare privacy postures across different providers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If third-party service providers lack transparency in data-sharing practices, then data security risks increase, but requiring transparency increases operational burden on providers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata security riskVSAvoidcompliance burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service mechanism where third-party service providers automatically submit their privacy policies, data sharing practices, and security measures to the monitoring system. This automation reduces the manual compliance burden on providers while ensuring consistent collection of transparency information. The system performs self-assessment and self-reporting, eliminating the need for complex manual audits or user-initiated investigations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent requires third-party service providers to pre-submit their privacy information and security measures before users interact with their services. This preliminary action allows the system to generate privacy scores in advance, enabling users to make informed decisions before data sharing occurs. It also gives providers time to prepare and standardize their privacy information, reducing last-minute compliance burdens.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If users review detailed privacy policies and data sharing practices, then privacy understanding improves, but time consumption and user effort increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy information understandingVSAvoiduser time consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses visual indicators and color-coded privacy scores to represent complex privacy information in an easily digestible format. Different color ranges (e.g., green for high privacy protection, red for low protection) allow users to quickly assess privacy postures without reading detailed policies. This visual encoding transforms lengthy textual information into immediate visual cues, dramatically reducing the time required to understand privacy practices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the most critical privacy information from comprehensive privacy policies and data sharing practices, focusing on key factors that most impact user privacy. Rather than requiring users to review entire privacy policies, the system identifies and highlights essential elements such as data collection purposes, sharing partners, and security measures, filtering out redundant or less relevant information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250148122A1Data collection analysis for privacy risk assessment
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20250148122A1 patent drawing
  • US20250148122A1 patent drawing
  • US20250148122A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes identifying, by a processing device, a third-party service provider of a plurality of third-party service providers that is authorized by a user to access data associated with the user. A data privacy score is generated based on one or more privacy risk factors. The data privacy score is associated with the third-party service provider. The data privacy score is indicative of a level of protection and privacy the third-party service provider maintains with respect to the data. A user interface (UI) displaying at least the data privacy score associated with the third-party service provider is provided for presentation on a client device associated with the user.