Privacy-Preserving Thermal Load Scheduling Without Home Thermal Models
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing thermal load management systems infringe on consumer privacy by requiring direct access to temperature and power consumption data, and are computationally intractable for large-scale implementations due to complex thermal models.
Innovation Solution
A two-stage optimization and control framework using LSTM-based price forecasting and heuristic relaxation to minimize electricity procurement costs without measuring or modeling individual homes' states, employing distributed open-loop control laws to ensure consumer comfort.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If direct access to temperature and power consumption data is used for thermal load management, then control precision is improved, but consumer privacy is compromised
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts only the necessary aggregate information (total power consumption of thermal loads) while leaving sensitive individual data (temperature readings, individual appliance consumption patterns) at the consumer premises. This allows the aggregator to perform load management based on aggregate demand signals without accessing or storing private consumer data, thus resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and privacy protection.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces a local controller at each consumer premises as an intermediary that processes temperature and power consumption data locally. This intermediary computes control decisions based on local measurements and communicates only aggregate power consumption signals to the aggregator, preventing direct access to sensitive consumer data while enabling effective thermal load management.
2Measurement precision
If complex thermal models are used for accurate load management, then control precision is improved, but computational complexity increases making large-scale implementation intractable
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces complex, computationally intensive thermal models with simple, lightweight control algorithms that can be executed by inexpensive local controllers. Instead of using detailed building thermal dynamics models requiring significant computational resources, the system employs simple on/off control logic based on temperature thresholds and aggregate power signals, making large-scale deployment feasible.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent enables each consumer premises to autonomously manage its thermal loads using local measurements and simple control logic. The local controllers independently make control decisions based on local temperature conditions and received aggregate power signals from the aggregator, eliminating the need for centralized complex model-based optimization that would be computationally intractable at scale.
3Stability of the object's composition
If centralized control of thermal loads is implemented, then system coordination is improved, but scalability to large numbers of consumers deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the thermal load management system into autonomous local controllers at each consumer premises that operate independently. Each local controller manages its own thermal loads based on local conditions and simple aggregate signals from the aggregator, eliminating the need for centralized coordination of individual appliances. This segmentation enables easy scalability to large numbers of consumers while maintaining system coordination through standardized communication protocols.
Data Source
AI summary
Methods, systems, and computer readable media for thermal load management of a collection of power consumers managed by an electric power aggregator. In some examples, a system includes a scheduling subsystem, implemented on one or more processors, configured for determining a plurality of cooling or heating control schedules for the collection of power consumers by forecasting one or more wholesale electricity price peaks. The system includes a control system implemented on one or more processors. The control system is configured for carrying out the cooling or heating control schedules at the individual consumer-level. The control system is configured for guaranteeing, for each power consumer of the collection of power consumers, a comfort constraint specified by a bilevel thermostat for the power consumer, wherein the comfort constraint comprises a lower level bound temperature and an upper bound temperature that the power consumer is willing to tolerate.


