Private Driveshare Passenger Service With Shared Hourly Blocks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing passenger transportation services lack a cost-effective option that allows consumers to hire a private car and driver while sharing the vehicle with other passengers, maintaining control over scheduling and providing a positive experience for all parties involved.

Innovation Solution

The Private Driveshare Passenger Transportation System enables consumers to reserve a timeframe for hourly service and share the driver and vehicle with other groups, allowing them to approve or reject ride requests and maintain control over their schedule, with payments made upon completion of the service.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If hourly private car service is offered, then scheduling control and service quality are improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling controlVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The service is segmented into time blocks that can be individually reserved and shared. Customers divide their needed service into discrete time segments, allowing partial sharing with others who need service during the same blocks, thereby reducing overall cost while maintaining control over specific time periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple customers' transportation needs are merged into shared time blocks when their routes and schedules overlap. By combining demand from multiple customers who need service during the same time periods, the system achieves cost savings through sharing while each customer maintains control over their reserved slots.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Quantity of substance

If by-the-ride service is offered, then cost decreases, but scheduling control and service quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidscheduling control
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Customers perform preliminary actions by reserving time blocks in advance before their actual transportation needs arise. This advance reservation allows them to secure cost-effective shared rates while ensuring scheduling control is established beforehand, avoiding last-minute expensive bookings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The service model dynamically adapts between pure private hire and shared ride modes. Customers can start with reserved time blocks and then dynamically share with others as opportunities arise, or keep blocks private if no suitable sharing matches are found, providing flexibility in both cost and control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Quantity of substance

If time blocks are shared with other passengers, then cost effectiveness improves, but service privacy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost effectivenessVSAvoidservice privacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different privacy levels are applied to different time blocks based on customer preferences. Customers can mark specific time blocks as private (no sharing) or open to sharing, allowing local customization of privacy settings for each segment of their reserved time, balancing cost savings with privacy needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary that carefully matches customers for shared time blocks, filtering compatible partners based on route compatibility, timing, and privacy preferences. This mediator function ensures that sharing only occurs when appropriate, protecting privacy while enabling cost-effective sharing when suitable matches are found.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If scheduling flexibility is increased to allow ride sharing, then productivity improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs self-service mechanisms where customers automatically receive notifications about potential shared ride matches and can accept or decline with a simple response. This automated self-service approach handles the complexity of matching and coordination without requiring complex manual intervention, improving productivity while managing system complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250307725A1Private Drive Share Passenger Transportation System
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 BARRY PETER JOHN

AI summary

THE PRIVATE DRIVESHARE PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CREATES A NEW SUB-INDUSTRY WITHIN THE PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION SECTOR. CAB COMPANIES THRIVE ON LONG DISTANCE RIDES WHICH LIMITS AVAILABILITY FOR SHORTER RIDE REQUESTS. RIDE-SHARE ENTITIES LIKE UBER/LYFT LACK THE PERSONAL TOUCH THAT A PRIVATE DRIVESHARE SERVICE PROVIDES AND IT IS MORE THAN LIKELY A DIFFERENT DRIVER AND DIFFERENT VEHICLE FOR EVERY RIDE SCHEDULED WITHIN A GIVEN DAY. PRIVATE DRIVE SHARE CLIENTS CAN STORE ITEMS IN THE BACK OF THE VEHICLE BETWEEN RIDES. PRIVATE CAR SERVICES ARE IN A WHOLE DIFFERENT CLASS OF COSTS THAT LIMITS THE AVERAGE CONSUMER FROM HIRING THEM. THIS SYSTEM ALLOWS AN AFFORDABLE OPTION FOR CLIENTS AND ALSO PROVIDES THE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE DRIVER TO MAXIMIZE THEIR POTENTIAL IN ANY GIVEN DAY. WHILE THE PRIVATE DRIVER IS THE LEAST AFFORDABLE FOR THE CONSUMER, LIMITING THE MARKET FOR THOSE COMPANIES TO WEALTHY INDIVIDUALS ONLY.