Private Federated Learning Model Update Privacy
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Federated learning systems lack effective privacy protections, as model updates transmitted from devices can be used to reconstruct individual user data, compromising user privacy, and existing solutions like differential privacy or secure multiparty computation incur high computational and communication costs or require trusted servers.
Innovation Solution
A private federated learning system that employs separated differential privacy to decompose model updates into unit vectors and magnitudes, privatizing each component separately to protect against reconstruction attacks, while using central differential privacy to further secure updates on the server, ensuring local privacy guarantees and reduced computational overhead.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If model updates are transmitted from devices to server for federated learning, then learning utility is improved, but user privacy is compromised due to reconstruction attacks
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments model updates into multiple components (e.g., gradient updates, intermediate parameters) and transmits them separately through multiple rounds of communication. This segmentation prevents adversaries from reconstructing the complete model update from a single transmission, thereby protecting user privacy while maintaining learning utility through cumulative aggregation of segmented updates.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces trusted intermediaries (such as aggregators or mediators) that receive, verify, and aggregate model updates from multiple devices before forwarding to the server. These intermediaries act as protective layers that prevent direct exposure of raw model updates to potential adversaries, enabling privacy-pres federated learning without sacrificing collaborative learning effectiveness.
2Object-affected harmful factors
If differential privacy or secure multiparty computation is used to protect privacy, then user privacy is improved, but computational and communication costs increase significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies partial differential privacy by adding noise only to specific sensitive components of model updates rather than to the entire model. This selective approach provides sufficient privacy protection for critical information while minimizing the computational overhead and communication costs associated with applying privacy mechanisms to all model parameters.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent dynamically adjusts privacy parameters (such as noise magnitude, segmentation granularity, or aggregation thresholds) based on the sensitivity of the data and the requirements of the learning task. This adaptive parameter adjustment allows the system to achieve adequate privacy protection with minimal computational and communication overhead, avoiding the excessive costs of fixed strong privacy mechanisms.
3Object-affected harmful factors
If trusted servers are used for secure federated learning, then privacy protection is improved, but system complexity and trust requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts and removes the trust requirement from the server by implementing client-side verification mechanisms and cryptographic proofs. Instead of relying on the server to be trusted, the system extracts the verification functionality to the client devices, allowing untrusted servers to participate in federated learning while maintaining privacy security through decentralized verification.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements self-service privacy protection where each device independently verifies the privacy compliance of model updates using local cryptographic checks and validation rules. This self-service approach eliminates the need for centralized trusted authorities, reducing system complexity and trust requirements while maintaining robust privacy security through distributed verification capabilities.
Data Source
AI summary
Embodiments described herein provide for a non-transitory machine-readable medium storing instructions to cause one or more processors to receive, at a client device, a machine learning model from a server, detect a usage pattern for a content item, store an association between the content item and the detected usage pattern in local data, train the machine learning model using local data for the content item with the detected usage pattern to generate a trained machine learning model, generate an update for the machine learning model, privatize the update for the machine learning model, and transmit the privatized update for the machine learning model to the server.


