Privilege Escalation Detection via Behavioral Resource Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies struggle to efficiently detect privilege escalations in computer systems, as they often rely on code analysis that may not identify vulnerabilities caused by incorrect permissions configurations, which can vary between hosts.

Innovation Solution

Collect behavioral data from privileged applications to create databases of high-privileged executables and sensitive resources, and analyze these to identify potential vulnerabilities by examining writable resources with lower privileges, generating indications for potential privilege escalations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If code analysis is used to detect privilege escalation vulnerabilities, then the detection process is straightforward, but it fails to identify vulnerabilities caused by incorrect permissions configurations that vary between hosts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddetection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting behavioral data from privileged applications and creating databases of high-privileged executables and sensitive resources before conducting vulnerability detection. This preliminary data collection enables more accurate detection of permission configuration vulnerabilities without requiring complex real-time analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces behavioral data databases as an intermediary between the detection system and the target host. These databases contain pre-collected information about privileged executables and sensitive resources, serving as a mediator that enables accurate vulnerability detection without requiring direct complex analysis of the target system's permission configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive behavioral data collection is performed to improve vulnerability detection, then detection reliability improves, but the time and resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivilege escalation detection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Behavioral data is collected and stored in databases in advance, before vulnerability detection is needed. This preliminary action allows the detection process to query pre-processed data rather than collecting and analyzing all behavioral data in real-time, significantly reducing detection time while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system collects and stores more behavioral data than immediately necessary, creating comprehensive databases of privileged executables and sensitive resources. This excessive data collection upfront enables faster, more reliable detection later by having all necessary information readily available for comparison and analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12463988B2Arrangement and method of privilege escalation detection in a computer or computer network
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 F SECURE CORP
  • US12463988B2 patent drawing
  • US12463988B2 patent drawing
  • US12463988B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An arrangement and a method of privilege escalation detection in a computer or computer network. The method comprises examining which executables are running in a target host; searching from a behavioral data source behavioral information of the executables running in the target host; including in a first list identification information of executables running in the target host which the behavioral information indicates are known to run with a first or a higher level privilege; including in a second list identification information of sensitive resources loaded or executed by the executables included in the first list; examining the sensitive resources included in the second list to determine whether that resource is writable by an executable running at a privilege level lower than the first level; and providing an indication of every resource that is loaded by the first or higher level privilege executable but is writable by the executable running at a privilege level lower than the first level as a potential vulnerability.