Privileged-Information Model Evaluation for Complex AI Tasks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning evaluation models struggle to provide accurate and trustworthy evaluations, especially when they are smaller than the candidate models being evaluated or when the tasks are complex, making it difficult to assess candidate model performance effectively.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of privileged information to evaluation models, which is not available to candidate models during solution generation, allows for more accurate evaluation by providing context and enabling weaker evaluation models to assess stronger candidate models, even on complex tasks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If an evaluation model is used to automatically evaluate candidate models, then the evaluation process is accelerated and cost is reduced, but the accuracy and trustworthiness of the evaluation deteriorates when the evaluation model is smaller than the candidate model or when tasks are complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation speedVSAvoidevaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces privileged information as an intermediary element that mediates between the evaluation model and candidate models. This privileged information (including ground truth solutions, task descriptions, and evaluation criteria) enables the evaluation model to accurately assess candidate models without requiring the evaluation model to be larger or more complex than the candidate models it evaluates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by preparing and providing privileged information to the evaluation model before the evaluation process begins. This includes pre-processing ground truth solutions, task descriptions, and evaluation criteria into a format that the evaluation model can use to accurately assess candidate models during the evaluation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Use of energy by moving object

If a smaller evaluation model is used, then computational resources and cost are reduced, but the ability to accurately evaluate stronger candidate models on complex tasks deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational costVSAvoidevaluation trustworthiness
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Privileged information serves as an intermediary that compensates for the limitations of smaller evaluation models. By providing ground truth solutions, task descriptions, and evaluation criteria, the evaluation model can reliably evaluate complex tasks without requiring increased model size or computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters available to the evaluation model by introducing privileged information with specific structures and formats. This includes providing ground truth solutions, task descriptions, and evaluation criteria that transform the evaluation process into a more reliable assessment without increasing model complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If privileged information is provided to the evaluation model, then evaluation accuracy is improved, but the complexity of the evaluation system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments privileged information into distinct components: ground truth solutions, task descriptions, and evaluation criteria. This segmentation allows the evaluation model to process different types of information separately and systematically, improving evaluation accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through structured organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming privileged information into specific formats and structures that the evaluation model can efficiently process. This includes organizing ground truth solutions, task descriptions, and evaluation criteria into standardized parameters that enhance evaluation accuracy without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4722996A1Use of privileged information to improve automatic evaluations
Publication Date: 2026.04.08 GDM HOLDING LLC
  • EP4722996A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4722996A1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP4722996A1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

According to one aspect, there is provided a computer-implemented method comprising: obtaining a first solution generated by a candidate model using a first query; generating a performance metric, using an evaluation model and conditioned on the first query, first solution and privileged information, wherein the performance metric comprises an evaluation output representing a performance of the candidate model; wherein the privileged information was not available to the candidate model when generating the first solution.