Proactive Artifact Analysis for Unicode Domain Impersonation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current security systems struggle to effectively detect and prevent domain name impersonation and other security threats, such as phishing and malware, particularly with the introduction of Unicode domain names which complicate visual comparison techniques.

Innovation Solution

A security system that monitors user interactions with computing devices, detects hover events over clickable objects, and performs real-time analysis of underlying artifacts to assess potential security risks. The system provides a safety assessment and detailed information about the artifact, helping users make informed decisions before selecting potentially harmful content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If visual comparison techniques are used to detect domain name impersonation, then detection simplicity is improved, but detection precision deteriorates with Unicode domain names

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection simplicityVSAvoiddetection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary analysis layer that examines multiple artifacts (domain name structure, WHOIS data, DNS records, SSL certificates, website content) rather than relying solely on direct visual comparison. This intermediary approach bridges the gap between simple detection methods and the need for precise Unicode domain name analysis by adding intermediate verification steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of analysis from simple visual string comparison to multi-dimensional parameter examination including domain registration data, DNS configuration, SSL certificate validity, and website content analysis. This parameter transformation enables precise detection of Unicode domain name impersonation while maintaining systematic detection processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If real-time analysis of underlying artifacts is performed, then security assessment accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity assessment accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-fetching and caching domain artifacts (WHOIS data, DNS records, SSL certificates) before they are needed for analysis. This allows the real-time security assessment to reuse pre-prepared data, reducing the computational complexity during the actual analysis phase while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The analysis process is segmented into independent modules: domain name validation, WHOIS data analysis, DNS record verification, SSL certificate checking, and website content analysis. Each module handles a specific aspect of the security assessment, making the overall complex system manageable and maintainable while achieving comprehensive security evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If proactive security information is provided to users, then user protection is improved, but information processing load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser protectionVSAvoidinformation processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by providing security information selectively rather than analyzing all possible artifacts for every user interaction. It performs analysis based on risk thresholds and user context, processing only the necessary portion of security data to provide adequate protection without overwhelming processing loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The security information system uses a nested structure where core security assessments are embedded within user interface interactions. The analysis artifacts (domain validation, SSL checks) are nested within the broader context of user browsing behavior, allowing efficient integration of security processing into existing user workflows without duplicating processing efforts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS20250110615A1Systems and methods for proactive analysis of artifacts associated with information resources
Publication Date: 2025.04.03 MIMECAST SERVICES LTD
  • US20250110615A1 patent drawing
  • US20250110615A1 patent drawing
  • US20250110615A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention is related to security systems and methods for proactively informing a user about an artifact associated with a clickable object on a user interface with which the user is interacting, where such information is provided to the user prior to selection of the clickable object. The information includes a safety assessment of the clickable object, details about the underlying artifact, such as the contents of an archive file, and general information helpful in assisting the user with making a decision as to whether to select the clickable object.