Proactive Tax Return Preparation System Using Statistical Accuracy Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Tax return preparation is labor-intensive due to the need for manual entry of repetitive personal and demographic information, as well as data from various sources, which does not change significantly from year to year.

Innovation Solution

A proactive tax preparation system that extracts information from a previous year's tax return, uses statistical models to predict accuracy, and automatically requests and integrates current year data from identified providers to generate a new tax return with minimal user intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual entry of tax information is used, then data accuracy can be verified by user review, but preparation time and labor intensity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidpreparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically extracting tax information from previous year's returns and pre-populating current year forms before user review. This advance preparation reduces the time users need to spend on manual entry while maintaining accuracy through subsequent verification steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of tax data from previous year's returns and uses them to populate current year forms. This copying approach eliminates redundant manual entry of unchanged information while allowing users to review and verify the copied data for accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If automated data extraction from previous year's return is implemented, then preparation efficiency increases, but risk of using outdated information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreparation efficiencyVSAvoidinformation currency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically determines which data fields to copy from previous year's returns versus which fields require updated information. It uses dynamic validation rules to identify fields that are likely to have changed and prompts users to verify or update those specific fields, balancing automation with information currency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where extracted data is validated against current year requirements and flagged for user review. This feedback loop ensures that automated extraction doesn't propagate outdated information by highlighting fields that need verification or updating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive user review of extracted data is required, then data accuracy is ensured, but user interface complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoiduser interface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by providing targeted review interfaces only for specific fields that require verification, rather than requiring comprehensive review of all fields. Users see simplified interfaces focused on the subset of data that needs attention, reducing overall interface complexity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If tax preparation is performed during off-peak times using automated processing, then overall system throughput increases, but handling of unexpected changes becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem throughputVSAvoidhandling of unexpected changes
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated processing during off-peak times to prepare draft returns in advance. This preliminary action increases system throughput by distributing workload, while the drafted returns remain editable and adaptable when users review them during peak periods, allowing handling of unexpected changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7860763B1Proactive tax preparation
Publication Date: 2010.12.28 INTUIT INC
  • US7860763B1 patent drawing
  • US7860763B1 patent drawing
  • US7860763B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated system prepares a new tax return for a user based on information associated with the user's return from a previous year. The system uses the tax return from the previous year to obtain taxpayer data and to identify sources of current data. It retrieves current year information from the sources and uses it together with data from the previous year return to prepare a new tax return with minimal user assistance. In an embodiment, the system determines the likely accuracy of a new tax return generated based on the previous year tax return, and prepares the new tax return only if the likely accuracy is above a predetermined threshold.