Probabilistic Feedback Attribution for Cross-Site Review Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Businesses face challenges in attributing online feedback to specific individuals due to varying identity representations across different review sites and the potential for fake or replicated feedback, making it difficult to manage their online reputation effectively.

Innovation Solution

A probabilistic feedback attribution system that utilizes machine learning models, such as logistic regression, to map feedback to individuals based on historical interaction data from CRM systems, analyzing feedback characteristics, and determining probabilistic confidence in attribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If heuristic methods are used for feedback attribution, then the process is simple and fast, but the accuracy of attributing feedback to specific individuals is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattribution accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces simple heuristic matching methods with machine learning models (logistic regression, random forest, neural networks) to automatically analyze feedback characteristics and determine attribution probabilities. This substitution of mechanical/heuristic systems with intelligent algorithms resolves the contradiction by providing high accuracy without requiring complex manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters used for attribution from basic identity matching to multiple feedback characteristics including sentiment analysis, writing style metrics, temporal patterns, and demographic data. By transforming the attribution problem into a multi-parameter probability assessment, the system achieves high accuracy while maintaining automated processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple feedback characteristics are analyzed for accurate attribution, then the attribution accuracy improves, but the processing complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattribution accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by pre-processing feedback data to extract characteristics such as sentiment scores, writing style metrics, and temporal patterns before the actual attribution process. This preliminary action prepares the data in advance, allowing the machine learning models to process multiple characteristics efficiently without increasing overall processing time significantly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Machine learning models automatically process multiple feedback characteristics in parallel, replacing sequential manual analysis. The models can evaluate sentiment, writing style, temporal patterns, and demographic data simultaneously, achieving high attribution accuracy without linearly increasing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If probabilistic mapping is used to determine feedback authorship, then the reliability of attribution increases, but the computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattribution reliabilityVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates attribution probabilities for multiple potential authors but applies thresholds to determine when additional computation is unnecessary. By performing partial attribution analysis and stopping when confidence thresholds are met, the system achieves high reliability without exhaustively computing all possible attributions, thus optimizing computational resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the attribution problem into a probability estimation task with configurable confidence thresholds. By changing from deterministic matching to probabilistic assessment with early termination criteria, the system achieves high reliability while controlling computational resource consumption through threshold-based decision making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12561721B1Feedback attribution
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 REPUTATION COM
  • US12561721B1 patent drawing
  • US12561721B1 patent drawing
  • US12561721B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Feedback attribution includes receiving a feedback item pertaining to an entity. It further includes receiving information pertaining to a plurality of candidate sources of the feedback item. It further includes determining a probabilistic mapping between the feedback item and the plurality of candidate sources. Determining the probabilistic mapping comprises determining, for each candidate source in the plurality of individuals, a likelihood that the feedback is attributed to a given candidate source.