Probabilistic Generative Model Link Selection Algorithm

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for modeling textual documents struggle to efficiently manage the large number of links between words and clusters in probabilistic generative models, leading to impractical memory usage and a lack of mechanisms for automatically selecting important links.

Innovation Solution

A system that updates a probabilistic generative model by determining expected counts and link-ratings for links and prospective links, selecting links based on these ratings, and ranking them to include only the most important ones in the new model, while ensuring source diversity and potentially introducing or deleting nodes and merging similar cluster nodes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system keeps track of every link between words and clusters in the probabilistic generative model, then the model can capture complete semantic relationships, but the memory requirements become impractical (hundreds of billions of links)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidnumber of links
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes unnecessary links from the model by applying a link selection algorithm that retains only the most significant links based on expected counts and link ratings. This extraction process reduces the number of links from hundreds of billions to a manageable size while preserving the most important semantic relationships between words and clusters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of link retention by using expected counts and link ratings as selection criteria. Instead of retaining all links, the system selectively keeps links with higher expected counts and ratings, transforming the model from complete to selective representation while maintaining semantic accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system stores all links in main memory, then the model structure is complete, but the memory consumption becomes impractical

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel completenessVSAvoidmemory usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and removes redundant links from memory, retaining only the essential links that contribute most to semantic representation. This extraction reduces memory consumption from storing hundreds of billions of links to a manageable subset while preserving model adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary link selection and rating during model construction, pre-determining which links are most important before full storage is required. This preliminary action enables memory-efficient storage by pre-filtering links based on expected counts and semantic significance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Quantity of substance

If the system selectively retains only important links, then memory requirements are reduced, but the model may lose some semantic relationships

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of linksVSAvoidsemantic coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from expected counts and link ratings to guide the selective retention process. By continuously evaluating link importance based on training data and adjusting selections accordingly, the system ensures that retained links maintain comprehensive semantic coverage while reducing overall link count.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the retention threshold and selection parameters dynamically based on model performance and semantic coverage requirements. This adaptive parameter adjustment ensures that the reduced link set maintains sufficient semantic relationships while achieving memory efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9418335B1Method and apparatus for selecting links to include in a probabilistic generative model for text
Publication Date: 2016.08.16 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9418335B1 patent drawing
  • US9418335B1 patent drawing
  • US9418335B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method may include receiving, at one or more processors, a current model. The current model may include a group of nodes representing words, at least one cluster of nodes representing related words, and a group of links. Each link may connect two nodes of the group of nodes. Each link may include a corresponding weight. The method may further include applying, by one or more processors, a set of training documents to the model to produce new weights for the group of links to create a new model; and making, by one or more processors, the new model the current model.