Probabilistic Scene Encoding for Unseen Autonomous Driving Scenarios

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous machines face challenges in navigating unpredictable real-world scenarios due to covariate shift, where training data does not encompass all possible situations, leading to degraded performance and unsafe behaviors, and current perception techniques are limited in accurately encoding the environment.

Innovation Solution

A probabilistic state simulation stack using a transformer architecture and generative DNNs to predict and sample state distributions, enabling the training of navigation policies to handle unseen scenarios and improve perception accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If neural planners are trained using imitation learning with recorded expert behavior, then they can make decisions based on observed patterns, but they fail to handle unseen situations due to covariate shift between training and deployment environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle unseen scenariosVSAvoidperformance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by generating synthetic training data that anticipates future unseen scenarios. The probabilistic state simulation stack creates diverse hypothetical situations before deployment, allowing the neural planner to pre-adapt to potential edge cases and reduce covariate shift effects during actual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by introducing probabilistic variations in state simulations. By sampling from predicted state distributions with varying probabilities, the training data encompasses a broader range of possible scenarios, enabling the neural planner to adapt to parameter changes it may encounter during deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If simulated training data is manually hand-crafted to represent edge cases, then the neural planner is exposed to diverse scenarios, but the process is error-prone and leads to unrealistic driving behaviors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of edge casesVSAvoiddata generation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by enabling the probabilistic state simulation stack to automatically generate synthetic training data without manual intervention. The system uses its own predicted state distributions to create realistic edge case scenarios, eliminating the need for error-prone manual data curation while maintaining behavioral authenticity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of real-world driving scenarios through probabilistic simulation. By sampling from predicted state distributions, it generates synthetic copies of potential driving situations that preserve the statistical properties and realism of actual data while covering edge cases that would be difficult to capture manually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If simulation environments are used to train neural planners, then they can handle simulated long tail cases, but their performance degrades in real-world scenarios due to the simulation gap

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling of long tail casesVSAvoidreal-world performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates accurate copies of real-world state distributions through probabilistic simulation. By sampling from predicted distributions that mirror actual deployment conditions, the synthetic training data preserves the statistical properties of real scenarios, reducing the simulation gap while maintaining coverage of long tail cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system adjusts parameters by using probabilistic state predictions that adapt to real-world conditions. The simulation dynamically modifies state parameters based on predicted distributions, allowing the neural planner to learn from scenarios that accurately reflect real-world variability rather than static simulated environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260029757A1Generative perception and scene encoding for autonomous and semi-autonomous machines and applications
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 NVIDIA CORP
  • US20260029757A1 patent drawing
  • US20260029757A1 patent drawing
  • US20260029757A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A probabilistic state simulation stack may be used to estimate and represent the state of a scene, including the state of an ego-machine (e.g., speed or position), traffic dynamics (e.g., the behavior of other road users), and/or static elements in the environment, a driving (or other navigation) policy may be co-trained as part of the probabilistic state simulation stack using a ground truth representation of human driving data, and at least a portion of the trained probabilistic state simulation stack may be deployed as an end-to-end drive stack in an autonomous or semi-autonomous machine (or some other type of control stack for other applications). This approach may be used to develop a robust driving policy by sampling state distributions predicted by the probabilistic state simulation stack to generate (e.g., simulate) any number of new (e.g., driving) situations and traffic scenarios and training the policy to handle these previously unseen scenarios.