Probabilistic State Simulation for Autonomous Drive Stack Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous machines face challenges in navigating real-world scenarios due to covariate shift, where the distribution of states during training differs from deployment, leading to suboptimal or unsafe behaviors, and current perception techniques are limited in accurately encoding real-world environments.

Innovation Solution

A probabilistic state simulation stack using a perception encoder and generative DNNs to predict and sample state distributions, co-training a navigation policy to handle unseen scenarios, improving accuracy and performance by generating simulated ground truth data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If simulated training data is manually hand-crafted to represent edge cases and long tail scenarios, then the neural planner can handle a broader spectrum of driving contexts, but the process is error-prone and leads to unrealistic driving behaviors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling of edge cases and long tail scenariosVSAvoidaccuracy of simulated data representation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses real-world sensor data and expert demonstrations as the ground truth to copy authentic driving scenarios, rather than manually crafting simulated data. This ensures the training data accurately represents real-world conditions while still capturing edge cases and long tail scenarios through the diversity of collected real-world data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of hand-crafting simulation data with an automated machine learning pipeline that collects, processes, and synthesizes training data from real-world sensors and expert demonstrations, eliminating human error in data creation while maintaining realism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If the neural planner is trained on expert demonstrations under typical driving conditions, then it performs well in represented situations, but it generates random or incorrect actions in response to previously unseen situations during deployment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance in represented situationsVSAvoidperformance in unseen situations
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent prepares the neural planner for unseen situations by pre-training it on a diverse dataset that includes edge cases and long tail scenarios collected from real-world sensors and expert demonstrations. This preliminary exposure to varied conditions before deployment enables the planner to generalize better to previously unseen situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a dynamic training approach where the training dataset is continuously expanded and updated with new real-world data and expert demonstrations, allowing the neural planner to adapt and improve its performance on unseen situations over time rather than being static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If conventional perception techniques are used to encode the environment, then the system is simpler, but the accuracy and richness of encoded inputs are limited, leading to incomplete environmental understanding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperception system structureVSAvoidaccuracy of environmental encoding
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple perception inputs (sensor data, map data, expert demonstrations) into a composite encoded representation of the environment. This composite encoding integrates diverse information sources to create a more accurate and rich environmental understanding while maintaining system manageability through unified processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS20260029759A1Probabilistic state simulation for end-to-end drive stack learning for autonomous and semi-autonomous machines and applications
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 NVIDIA CORP
  • US20260029759A1 patent drawing
  • US20260029759A1 patent drawing
  • US20260029759A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In various examples, perception encoder uses one or more neural networks implemented using a transformer architecture, a sensor perspective encoding, a planned navigation route, and/or detected ego-motion to extract a scene embedding representing one or more aspects of an observed scene, such as visual information, motion information, ego-state of an ego-machine, a planned navigation route, and/or other types of information. The perception encoder may be used in a probabilistic state simulation stack, and/or may be used to extract and apply a scene embedding as an input for 3D perception or reconstruction tasks such as object detection and classification, semantic segmentation, depth map extraction, trajectory prediction, path planning, navigation control, and/or localization or mapping, to name a few example tasks.