Probabilistic Water Quality Assessment Method

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for assessing the ecological status of coastal and transitional waters face challenges such as the 'one-out, all-out' principle, lack of cause-effect relationship delineation, unclear reference conditions, and high uncertainty due to spatial and temporal variability, leading to over-precautionary results and inefficiencies in implementing the Water Framework Directive (WFD).

Innovation Solution

A probabilistic method using the logarithmic transformation of chlorophyll α with oxygen deviation and dissolved inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus as metrics, combined with a distributional approach to quantify uncertainty, allowing for the calculation of an ecological quality ratio (EQR) that estimates the likelihood of water bodies being in specific quality classes, thereby guiding targeted remediation measures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the 'one-out, all-out' principle is applied to assess ecological status, then the assessment is conservative and protective, but it results in over-precautionary outcomes and loss of nuance in quality evaluation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconservatism of assessmentVSAvoidnuance in quality evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the ecological quality ratio from a single deterministic value into a probabilistic distribution characterized by mean, standard deviation, and skewness. This parameter transformation allows the assessment to retain conservatism through confidence intervals while recovering nuanced information about the likelihood of achieving good ecological status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces confidence intervals and probability distributions as intermediaries between the binary 'one-out, all-out' assessment and the actual ecological quality. These statistical tools mediate the assessment by providing a range of plausible values rather than a single deterministic outcome, thus preserving both conservatism and informational nuance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple descriptors are used for quality assessment, then the assessment comprehensiveness is improved, but the complexity of the assessment exercise increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of assessment exercise
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple quality descriptors into a single integrated probabilistic assessment of the ecological quality ratio. By merging the information from multiple descriptors into a unified probability distribution, the method maintains comprehensive evaluation while simplifying the output and decision-making process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms multiple deterministic descriptor values into a single probabilistic parameter set (mean, standard deviation, skewness) that characterizes the overall ecological quality. This parameter transformation reduces the complexity of handling multiple descriptors while preserving their combined informational content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If reference conditions are defined with fixed boundaries, then the classification is straightforward and easy to implement, but the uncertainty from natural variability and data limitations is not adequately captured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of classificationVSAvoiduncertainty capture
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces static reference condition boundaries with dynamic probabilistic thresholds that account for natural variability. The reference conditions are expressed as distributions rather than fixed values, allowing the classification to adapt to the inherent uncertainty in ecological systems while maintaining operational clarity through confidence intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback from the variability and uncertainty in the data into the classification process. By using confidence intervals and probability distributions, the system provides feedback about the reliability of the assessment, allowing users to understand both the classification result and the uncertainty associated with it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If deterministic values are used for quality indicators, then the assessment is simple and quick to compute, but the spatial and temporal variability and uncertainty are not adequately represented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidrepresentation of variability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter representation from single deterministic values to probabilistic distributions characterized by three parameters (mean, standard deviation, skewness). This transformation maintains computational efficiency by using a compact parameter set while dramatically improving the representation of spatial and temporal variability and uncertainty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4575492A1Water quality assesment method
Publication Date: 2025.06.25 FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING ARCHITECTURE & GEODESY UNIVERSITY OF SPLIT
  • EP4575492A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4575492A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4575492A1 patent drawingFigure 5~6b

AI summary

Method for assessment of the quality of the water based on quantifying the uncertainty using the full probabilistic description for selected quality indicators at the reference and impacted site from the historical data record available for the study area. The method consist of the steps of selecting quality descriptors for status assessment, establishing of reference conditions under uncertainty, and development of the ecological quality ratio, wherein ecological quality ratio is presented through the concept of the environmental risk analysis as a probability of exceedance named the risk of deviation from the reference condition and it is evaluated through the distributional approach resulting in the probability distribution over five ecological classes.