Proximity Probe Compatibility Testing via Impedance Self-Check

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inductive proximity sensors face challenges in ensuring accurate assembly of compatible components, as the controller, proximity probe, and cable must be matched for calibrated operation, and incorrect assembly can lead to incorrect proximity measurements.

Innovation Solution

A self-testing subsystem is integrated into the proximity sensing system, which generates an oscillating magnetic field and modifies the impedance of the resonant circuit formed by the proximity probe and cable, allowing for the determination of compatibility by comparing the initial and modified proximity signals against a reference signal, indicating compatibility or incompatibility based on a threshold difference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the controller, proximity probe, and cable are decoupled and stored separately for flexibility, then adaptability is improved, but the risk of incorrect assembly increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent assembly flexibilityVSAvoidassembly correctness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a self-test before normal operation to verify component compatibility. The controller tests the impedance of the connected probe and cable combination against stored reference values, ensuring correct assembly before the sensor is used for measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides visual feedback through LED indicators to show whether the assembled components are compatible. Different LED patterns indicate compatible vs. incompatible component combinations, guiding the user to correct improper assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If component labels are added to identify compatibility, then assembly correctness can be improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly correctnessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller automatically performs impedance testing of connected components without requiring external labeling or manual verification. The system self-identifies compatible component combinations through electrical characterization, eliminating the need for physical labels while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If impedance testing is performed to verify component compatibility, then measurement precision is improved, but additional time is required for testing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproximity measurement accuracyVSAvoidassembly verification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The impedance testing is performed automatically as a preliminary step during system initialization or power-up, before normal measurement operations begin. This ensures component compatibility is verified in advance without interrupting the main measurement function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The self-test integration allows the system to verify component compatibility without significant interruption to operational workflow. The testing occurs during natural system state transitions (power-up, mode changes) maintaining continuous useful action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures accurate assembly of compatible components by providing a compatibility or incompatibility signal, preventing incorrect measurements and ensuring reliable operation of the proximity sensor.

Implementation Method 1

The proximity probe can be configured to generate an oscillating magnetic field in response to receipt of an oscillating current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The proximity probe and the cable can form a resonant circuit possessing a capacitance C1 in parallel with an inductance L1

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Data Source

PatentUS11112522B2Proximity sensing system with component compatibility testing
Publication Date: 2021.09.07 BENTLY NEVADA INC
  • US11112522B2 patent drawing
  • US11112522B2 patent drawing
  • US11112522B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Self-testing proximity testing systems and corresponding methods are discussed herein and can include a proximity probe and controller in electrical communication via a cable. A self-testing subsystem can be in communication with the controller and configured to determine whether proximity probes and cables assembled with a controller are compatible or incompatible. The self-testing subsystem can place a known impedance in electrical communication with the controller, modifying a proximity signal output by the controller. When the modified proximity signal differs from a predicted proximity signal by greater than or equal to a threshold amount, the self-testing subsystem can output a first indication indicating that incompatible proximity probes and cables are assembled with a controller. When the modified proximity signal differs from a predicted proximity signal by less than the threshold amount, the self-testing subsystem can output a second indication indicating that compatible proximity probes and cables are assembled with a controller.