Probe-Guided Machining Control With ML Deviation Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Machine learning techniques have not been fully applied in high-accuracy manufacturing processes, such as high-accuracy drilling, particularly on an industrial scale, to provide predictive capability for machining accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A machining system comprising an automated manipulator configurable between a measuring and machining configuration, utilizing a machine learning agent to estimate machining coordinate deviation based on determined coordinate data, and a controller to decide whether machining can proceed based on a threshold deviation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If machine learning techniques are applied to predict machining accuracy, then scrappage is reduced and machining precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A machine learning agent is introduced as an intermediary component between the automated manipulator and the control system. This agent receives coordinate data from the position probe and predicts machining coordinate deviations, enabling accuracy improvement without requiring direct modification of the core machining hardware, thus managing complexity through software-based mediation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning agent performs preliminary prediction of machining coordinate deviations before the actual machining operation commences. By analyzing coordinate data from the measuring configuration and predicting potential deviations, the system can preemptively adjust parameters or alert operators, preventing accuracy issues before they manifest in the finished workpiece.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If coordinate data is measured and analyzed before machining, then machining precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement and analysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Coordinate data measurement and machine learning analysis are performed in advance during the measuring configuration phase, before the workpiece is committed to machining. This preliminary action establishes baseline accuracy predictions that guide subsequent machining operations, ensuring precision without delaying the actual production timeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Traditional extensive physical measurement and trial machining processes are replaced with a machine learning-based prediction system. The agent rapidly analyzes coordinate data and predicts deviations using computational models, substituting time-consuming mechanical measurement and iterative testing with faster information-based decision making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If threshold coordinate deviation is enforced to reduce scrappage, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining accuracyVSAvoidmachining throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning agent performs preliminary assessment of coordinate deviations before machining begins. By predicting accuracy outcomes in advance and comparing them against threshold criteria, the system can approve or reject machining operations proactively, preventing scrappage without requiring post-processing inspection or rework, thus maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through the machine learning agent that continuously monitors coordinate data and predicts deviations. This real-time feedback mechanism enables dynamic decision-making about whether to proceed with machining, allowing the system to maintain strict accuracy thresholds while optimizing throughput by only rejecting operations with predicted failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12565334B2Machining system
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 AIRBUS OPERATIONS LTD
  • US12565334B2 patent drawing
  • US12565334B2 patent drawing
  • US12565334B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A machining system includes an automated manipulator configurable between a measuring configuration, in which a position probe is operable, and a machining configuration, in which a tool is operable, a fixture for holding a template or a workpiece, and a controller. The controller is configured cause the automated manipulator, in the measuring configuration, to move the position probe to at least one reference feature of the template held in the fixture, to determine coordinate data associated with the at least one reference feature. Then, the controller provides the determined coordinate data to a machine learning agent which is trained to provide an estimate of machining coordinate deviation based on the determined coordinate data. If the estimated machining coordinate deviation is below a threshold coordinate deviation, the automated manipulator is allowed to proceed to machine a workpiece.