Aircraft Probe Heat Monitoring for Icing-Condition Power Degradation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional aircraft probe heat monitoring systems lack the accuracy to detect slight degradations in current flow, which can lead to inadequate heating in severe icing conditions, failing to ensure safe operation despite current being above the trigger level.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes power monitoring equipment and a processor to calculate the expected power demand based on air data parameters and atmospheric conditions, comparing it to the actual demand, and taking corrective actions such as adjusting power supply or removing the probe from the voting arrangement if there's a significant discrepancy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional current draw monitoring is used to detect heater circuit failures, then the system complexity is low and ease of operation is maintained, but the measurement precision is insufficient to detect slight degradations in current flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent flow detection accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational model that estimates expected heater power consumption based on probe temperature, airflow conditions, and heater characteristics. This intermediary layer between simple current measurement and complex failure detection enables precise monitoring without requiring direct complex measurement systems. The model acts as a mediator that translates environmental parameters into expected power consumption patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously compares actual heater power consumption against expected consumption derived from real-time environmental sensing and computational modeling. This feedback mechanism enables the system to detect deviations indicating heater degradation or failure. The feedback loop incorporates temperature sensors, airflow measurements, and power consumption data to dynamically adjust and validate heater performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the trigger level is set to detect slight current degradation, then the reliability improves, but the current must be measured with sufficiently high accuracy which increases device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheater performance reliabilityVSAvoidpower monitoring complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces direct complex electrical current measurement with a computational approach that uses temperature sensing, airflow measurement, and thermal modeling to infer heater power consumption. This substitution of mechanical/electrical measurement systems with computational thermal modeling reduces the complexity of high-precision power monitoring while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors multiple parameters (temperature, airflow, power consumption) and uses their relationships to detect heater degradation. By changing from monitoring a single parameter (current) to monitoring multiple parameters and their interrelationships, the system achieves high reliability without requiring extremely precise single-parameter measurement equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If conventional monitoring only triggers on significant current reduction, then the device complexity remains low, but the heating performance may be insufficient in severe icing conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-ice system reliabilityVSAvoidsystem operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of heater performance degradation by continuously comparing actual versus expected power consumption before failure occurs. Environmental sensors and computational models predict expected heater behavior under current conditions, enabling early warning of degradation trends. This preliminary action allows corrective measures to be taken before complete heater failure in severe icing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system uses the existing heater control infrastructure and environmental sensors already present in the aircraft, making the system self-sufficient. The computational model uses data from existing sensors (temperature, airflow) and the heater control system itself to perform monitoring, eliminating the need for separate complex monitoring hardware and simplifying operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the reliability of aircraft probe heating systems by ensuring sufficient power is maintained for safe operation, even in changing conditions, thereby preventing icing and maintaining accurate data collection.

Implementation Method 1

a self-compensating heater (103) configured to heat the device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentEP3766782B1Active aircraft probe heat monitor and method of use
Publication Date: 2024.01.24 ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE INC
  • EP3766782B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3766782B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A method including providing power to an aircraft probe (102) anti-ice system, monitoring an actual power demand of the aircraft probe anti-ice system, monitoring an air data parameter and atmospheric conditions surrounding an aircraft (110) and calculating an expected power demand of the aircraft probe anti-ice system based on the air data parameters and the atmospheric conditions, comparing the actual power demand of the aircraft probe anti-ice system to the expected power demand, and performing a corrective action if the actual power demand and the expected power demand are different by more than an acceptable amount.