Probe Quality Scoring Using Link Distance and Bearing Deviation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing probe point technologies suffer from varying levels of accuracy, which can decrease confidence in applications relying on them, particularly those requiring precise location data for traffic analysis and navigation, as the accuracy of GPS sensors can vary significantly.

Innovation Solution

A method to determine a measure of probe quality by calculating the distance and bearing difference between probe points and a representative link, clustering these points based on lane number, and filtering them to ensure only high-quality points are used, thereby enhancing accuracy and confidence in application results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If GPS sensor is used to define probe point locations, then probe data can be collected widely, but location accuracy deteriorates with spatial errors up to 20 meters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprobe data coverageVSAvoidlocation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of location representation from raw GPS coordinates to a transformed coordinate system where distances and bearings are calculated relative to road link geometry. This transformation allows the system to work with imprecise GPS data while producing accurate traffic analysis results by measuring deviations from expected road patterns rather than relying on absolute position accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If probe points with varying accuracy are used, then data collection is simplified, but application confidence deteriorates due to inconsistent quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collection simplicityVSAvoidapplication confidence
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a feedback mechanism where the system calculates expected distances and bearings based on road link geometry, then compares these expectations against actual probe point measurements. This feedback loop allows the system to identify and filter out low-quality probe points that deviate significantly from expected patterns, thereby maintaining high application confidence without complicating data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Quantity of substance

If all probe points are utilized without filtering, then data volume is maximized, but result accuracy deteriorates due to inclusion of low-quality points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata volumeVSAvoidresult accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality assessment by evaluating each probe point individually based on its specific distance and bearing characteristics relative to the road link. Instead of uniformly accepting or rejecting all probe points, the system assigns quality metrics to individual points based on their local geometric properties, allowing high-quality points to be included while filtering out low-quality ones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If location accuracy is increased for all probe points, then application reliability improves, but system complexity increases due to need for quality assessment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication reliabilityVSAvoidquality assessment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex physical location accuracy improvement mechanisms with a computational approach. Instead of requiring more accurate GPS hardware or complex signal processing, the system uses mathematical transformations and geometric calculations to achieve reliable results from standard GPS data, substituting mechanical precision requirements with algorithmic processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11474511B2Method, apparatus and computer program product for determining a measure of probe quality
Publication Date: 2022.10.18 HERE GLOBAL BV
  • US11474511B2 patent drawing
  • US11474511B2 patent drawing
  • US11474511B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, apparatus and computer program product are provided to determine a measure of probe quality, such as a level of accuracy with which the location of a probe point is defined. In the context of a method and for a plurality of probe points, a distance is determined between a respective probe point and a line representative of a link. For the plurality of probe points, the method also includes determining a difference between a bearing of the respective probe point and a bearing of the link. The method further includes determining the measure of probe quality based upon a product of a representation of the distance between the plurality of probe points and the line representative of the link and a representation of the difference between the bearing of the plurality of probe points and the bearing of the link.