Probiotic Bacteria Preservation via Optimal Harvest Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing probiotic bacteria face challenges in maintaining high viability and stability during fermentation and preservation processes, leading to reduced effectiveness and increased costs in direct-fed microbial products.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the harvesting of probiotic bacteria at specific growth phases, followed by concentration and preservation techniques such as encapsulation, refrigeration, lyophilization, or freezing, to maintain high viable cell counts and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If probiotic bacteria are cultured using traditional fermentation methods, then production cost is reduced, but viability and stability during preservation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviability and stability of probiotic bacteriaVSAvoidproduction cost and complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by harvesting bacteria at the optimal growth phase (stationary phase) before viability deteriorates, and by pre-formulating preservation compositions with specific carriers and protective agents. This advance planning and timing ensures high viability is maintained through the preservation process without requiring complex post-processing interventions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by combining probiotic bacteria with specific carrier materials (such as starch, sugar, or protein-based carriers) and protective agents in a formulated composition. This composite approach enhances stability and viability during preservation while maintaining cost-effectiveness through the use of food-grade carrier materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Quantity of substance

If probiotic bacteria are harvested at later growth phases, then cell concentration increases, but viability and stability decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell concentrationVSAvoidviability and stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces reliance on extended bacterial growth (time-based accumulation) with a formulation-based approach. By using optimized carrier compositions and protective agents, the system achieves high viable cell concentrations without requiring bacteria to be cultured to later growth phases where viability would deteriorate. This substitution of growth-time for formulation-quality resolves the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If advanced preservation techniques are used, then viability and stability are maintained, but process complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviability and stabilityVSAvoidpreservation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs inexpensive, food-grade carrier materials (such as starch, sugar, or protein-based carriers) that provide effective preservation without requiring complex or expensive equipment. These simple, disposable-like carrier formulations achieve high viability maintenance through their inherent protective properties rather than through complex preservation infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes specific parameters of the preservation composition, such as moisture content, pH, water activity, and carrier-to-bacteria ratio, to enhance viability and stability. By carefully controlling these compositional parameters rather than using complex preservation equipment, the system maintains high reliability with simple processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the viability and stability of probiotic bacteria, leading to improved product stability, consumer confidence, and increased profitability in the direct-fed microbial industry.

Implementation Method 1

Lactobacillus ferment carbohydrates to form lactic acid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFermentation: Fermentation

Implementation Method 2

lyophilization, or freezing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLyophilization: Freeze Drying

Data Source

PatentUS10864237B2Composition for enhanced milk production and feed efficiency and pathogen inhibition
Publication Date: 2020.12.15 MICROBIOS INC
  • US10864237B2 patent drawing
  • US10864237B2 patent drawing
  • US10864237B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Lactobacillus-based probiotic compositions for inclusion in microbial-based products. In one instance, the microbial-based product takes the form of an animal feed additive. When used as a feed additive for animals, especially ruminants, and in particular cattle, the following benefits from the composition are noted: (i) improved milk yield in dairy cattle, (ii) improved milk composition in dairy cattle, (iii) increased weight gain-to-feed intake ratio in beef cattle (feed efficiency), and (vi) improved average daily weight gain. Both Lactobacillus strains MB101 having ATCC Accession Number PTA-121710 and MB102 having ATCC Accession Number PTA-121711 are particularly effective at producing these results. Another marked benefit of the compositions when used as an animal feed additive is inhibition of pathogenic growth including E. coli, Salmonella, Clostridium, Staphylococcus and Streptococcus.