Procatalyst Composition Halogenation for Polymer Selectivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Ziegler-Natta catalyst compositions for olefin-based polymers lack variability in molecular weight distribution and selectivity, and there is a need for higher bulk density and phthalate-free alternatives.

Innovation Solution

A process involving halogenation of a procatalyst precursor in the presence of a substituted phenylene aromatic diester at controlled temperatures to form a procatalyst composition with enhanced selectivity and bulk density, using magnesium and titanium moieties with a substituted phenylene aromatic diester as an internal electron donor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional Ziegler-Natta catalyst compositions are used, then polymerization can proceed, but the molecular weight distribution remains narrow and selectivity is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemolecular weight distribution variabilityVSAvoidcatalyst composition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the catalyst system by introducing substituted phenylene aromatic diesters with specific structural variations (different substituents at positions 3 and 5 of the phenylene ring). This modifies the electronic and steric properties of the internal electron donor, thereby changing the catalyst's selectivity and the polymer's molecular weight distribution without fundamentally altering the Ziegler-Natta catalyst structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite catalyst system combining magnesium halide support, titanium halide active sites, organoaluminum cocatalyst, and substituted phenylene aromatic diester internal electron donor. The synergistic interaction between these components produces the desired broad molecular weight distribution and enhanced selectivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Volume of stationary object

If conventional procatalyst preparation methods are used, then catalyst can be formed, but bulk density of the polymer is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolymer bulk densityVSAvoidprocatalyst composition control
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the particle size parameter of the procatalyst precursor to a specific range (5-25 μm, preferably 8-18 μm). This size control, combined with controlled halogenation conditions, produces catalyst particles that generate polymers with improved bulk density while maintaining compositional precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If conventional halogenation temperature is used (≥115°C), then reaction proceeds efficiently, but selectivity index is poor (≥2.5)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst selectivityVSAvoidhalogenation temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional temperature approach by conducting halogenation at lower temperatures (25-115°C, preferably 40-100°C). This counterintuitive parameter change improves selectivity index to below 2.5 by controlling the reaction kinetics and preventing side reactions that occur at higher temperatures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a two-stage halogenation process: first stage at lower temperature (25-115°C) to establish high selectivity, and second stage at higher temperature to complete the halogenation. This periodic temperature variation achieves both high selectivity and complete reaction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional internal electron donors are used, then catalyst can function, but phthalate derivatives are present which are undesirable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephthalate presenceVSAvoidcatalyst synthesis simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and replaces conventional phthalate-based internal electron donors with substituted phenylene aromatic diesters. This substitution removes the harmful phthalate derivatives from the catalyst system while maintaining the essential internal electron donor function for catalyst performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates substituted phenylene aromatic diesters as non-phthalate internal electron donors in the catalyst composite. These alternative compounds provide the necessary electron donation functionality without introducing phthalate derivatives, achieving both environmental compliance and catalytic performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process improves the selectivity and bulk density of olefin-based polymers, achieving a broader molecular weight distribution and higher isotacticity while eliminating phthalate derivatives, resulting in a phthalate-free catalyst composition and polymer.

Implementation Method 1

halogenating a procatalyst precursor in the presence of a substituted phenylene aromatic diester at a temperature less than 115°C

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHalogenation: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

The internal electron donor includes a substituted phenylene aromatic diester

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron donation: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP2373701B1Enhanced procatalyst composition and process
Publication Date: 2016.03.09 WR GRACE & CO CONN
  • EP2373701B1 patent drawing
  • EP2373701B1 patent drawing
  • EP2373701B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are processes for preparing procatalyst compositions and polymers, i.e., propylene-based polymers, produced therefrom. The present procatalyst compositions improve catalyst selectivity and also increase the bulk density of the formant polymer.