Procedural Trajectory Prediction for Airspace Violation Alerts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current air traffic control systems face challenges in accurately predicting aircraft trajectories and generating timely and relevant alerts to prevent airspace violations, often resulting in missed alerts or false positives due to simplistic trajectory extrapolation methods.

Innovation Solution

The system compares recent aircraft trajectory data with procedural trajectory information specific to airports or airspaces, using a conflict detector unit with a procedural trajectory prediction unit to determine predicted trajectories and generate alerts for potential airspace violations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If simplistic trajectory extrapolation methods are used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision of trajectory prediction deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory prediction system complexityVSAvoidtrajectory prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The trajectory prediction system is segmented into multiple independent modules: a procedural trajectory database storing pre-defined flight paths, a real-time trajectory extractor capturing current aircraft position and velocity, and a prediction engine that combines these elements. This segmentation allows each module to specialize in specific tasks, improving overall prediction accuracy without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Procedural trajectory information is pre-computed and stored in a database before runtime operations. These pre-defined flight paths, including standard arrival and departure procedures, are prepared in advance and can be quickly referenced during real-time tracking, eliminating the need for complex real-time calculations of standard flight paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If procedural trajectory information is integrated, then trajectory prediction accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory prediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem structural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The procedural trajectory database serves multiple functions: it provides prediction data, validates extracted trajectories against standard procedures, and generates alerts for deviations. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate validation and alerting systems, thereby limiting the increase in overall system complexity while maintaining improved prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

A trajectory prediction module acts as an intermediary between the procedural database and the alerting system. This mediator compares real-time extracted trajectories with predicted procedural trajectories and generates alerts only when significant deviations occur, simplifying the alerting logic while maintaining high prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If real-time trajectory extraction and comparison is performed, then alert reliability is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial comparison by focusing only on critical trajectory parameters and segments where deviations are most likely to occur, such as approach and departure phases. Rather than continuously comparing all trajectory points, the system selectively analyzes key segments, maintaining alert reliability while reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

When an aircraft is confirmed to be following a standard procedural path, the system skips detailed continuous comparison and only performs periodic checks. This allows the system to rush through routine monitoring phases quickly while maintaining reliability by periodically verifying trajectory adherence without excessive processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS10347142B2Air traffic system using procedural trajectory prediction
Publication Date: 2019.07.09 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US10347142B2 patent drawing
  • US10347142B2 patent drawing
  • US10347142B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one example, a method for generating air traffic alerts includes determining a predicted trajectory for a target air-craft, based at least in part on a comparison of information received on a recent trajectory of the target aircraft with a set of procedural trajectory information. The method further includes determining whether a violation of protected airspace is predicted between the target aircraft and an ownship, based at least in part on the predicted trajectory for the target aircraft and a predicted trajectory for the ownship. The method further includes generating an alert output in response to determining that the violation of protected airspace is predicted.